Contents

User talk:Intothebonchet

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Johor Darul Ta'zim F.C.. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Snowflake91 (talk) 22:18, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Robby.is.on. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Daniel Bennett (footballer), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Robby.is.on (talk) 07:24, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kim Shin-wook, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 07:36, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sherif El-Masri, you may be blocked from editing. GiantSnowman 19:53, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Please use the standard layout and formatting as outlined at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players which is the result of past discussions of the community of football editors at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football. Specifically, there should no "Club", "International", etc. sub-headings. Also, be sure to include WP:inline citations for any content you add. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 07:27, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there! Thank you for your contributions to Singapore football articles. I noted that you had added on SPL clubs' performance outside of Singapore (aka AFC etc). I had removed a few such sections from various SPL clubs as of now. I think it is much better to write in prose rather than using a list or table format.

As the English Premier League's clubs are rather well written, I am looking at it as a guide. So for example, Manchester United F.C., do not contain stand alone sections listing their performance outside of the league but written into the history section. I noted that for MUFC, it is actually partially written in List of Manchester United F.C. seasons without the details. Details are already presented in the respective articles and Wikipedia does not encourage duplication of content where possible.

Perhaps you will be interested in creating similar list articles? Thanks Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 03:19, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Intothebonchet! Your additions to Singapore Premier League have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• Ifyou own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:04, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please note the above message as you have copied directly for Jurong East Stadium. Please do not do so again. Thanks. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 09:58, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also on Clementi Stadium. Please don't add copyright material to Wikipedia. — Diannaa (talk) 13:22, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission, as you did at Amy Recha. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Hadal (talk) 21:24, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, it is clear that you have been warned repeatedly in the past for various infractions; yet you do not appear interested in reading or responding to this feedback. --Hadal (talk) 21:24, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Intothebonchet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

To whoever it may concerned, firstly i would like to apologise for the misunderstanding for the mistakes that i did as i’m new to Wikipedia and im picking up new things including the rules along the way. I’m here on wikipedia not to abused any rules or whatsoever as my only main focus is to update anything revolving Singapore Premier League from current players and club history in their quest and happenings throughout the season. My only goal is to helped my country league and clubs/players have a dedicated profile, accurate stats in hoping that i would help boost up and bring back the glory days of fans having that knowledge through Wikipedia but i wasn’t assured properly of what i did. Now that you mentioned it, i deeply regretted of repeating my mistake despite the warning. I’ve learnt alot from understanding about the copyright issues which i wont do it ever again.

Decline reason:

In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:

• What is copyright?
• How is Wikipedia licenced?
• Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
• Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
• How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 20:42, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.