Contents

User talk:Isheden

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 00:25, 9 July 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:25, 9 July 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Resolved - If you could consider adding a brief summary of relevant formulae in the image description this image can now move to commons :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:12, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I wrote a reply here. AxelBoldt (talk) 14:35, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed that you performed the merge for Charcot-Bouchard aneurysm and that you do other merging work. It looks like you use proper edit summaries and {{R from merge}}. Thanks for all of that. It would be helpful if you could also use {{Copied}} on the talk pages. Let me know if you have any questions. Flatscan (talk) 04:24, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Isheden!

You are making many positive contributions to optimization articles.

You may wish to consider introducing yourself or even joining a WP:WikiProject, for example in mathematics, computer science, and systems (e.g., optimization): The WikiProjects' main-pages and talk-pages may interest you.

Best regards,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 18:01, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider/vet my moves of relaxation methodtorelaxation (approximation) and of relaxation techniquetorelaxation (iterative method); these moves tried to resolve problems discussed regarding a proposed renaming of the category, category:relaxation methods, which is being discussed.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 22:18, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Given your interests in duality and in convexity, you might like to look at Shapley–Folkman lemma, which I'm trying to improve to A- (and soon thereafter) to Featured-Status. There is a small (summary-style) section on optimization, which might especially interest you.

Sincerely,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 22:36, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I was wondering if you might reconsider your removal of the Fractions category tag from "localization of a ring" and "total quotient ring". If you still want to maintain these changes, can you let me know what your criteria are that you're deciding with? At first glance, including the Fraction category for these two articles seems appropriate. Thanks, Rschwieb (talk) 17:26, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your answer  in Talk:Fraction_(mathematics) is not correct, because you have removed the last paragraph and your signature of an anterior message, to bring that paragraph elsewhere.  If you want, you can cancel your last modification, then you can write again your answer.  We must be rigorous to be credible.
— Aughost (talk) 14:40, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.
— Aughost (talk) 06:53, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Fraction (mathematics), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Division (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Conjugate (algebra), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Perfect square (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have attempted a response to your question.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 19:47, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, my name is Michael Tsikerdekis[1][2], currently involved as a student in full time academic research at Masaryk University. I am writing to you to kindly invite you to participate in an online survey about interface and online collaboration on Wikipedia. The survey has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Foundation Research Committee.

I am contacting you because you were randomly selected from a list of active editors. The survey should take about 7 to 10 minutes to complete, and it is very straightforward.

Wikipedia is an open project by nature. Let’s create new knowledge for everyone! :-)

To take part in the survey please follow the link: tsikerdekis.wuwcorp.com/pr/survey/?user=14165625 (HTTPS).

Best Regards, --Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 12:04, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS: The results from the research will become available online for everyone and will be published in an open access journal.

UPDATE: This is the second and final notification for participating in this study. Your help is essential for having concrete results and knowledge that we all can share. I would like to thank you for your time and as always for any questions, comments or ideas do not hesitate to contact me. PS: As a thank you for your efforts and participation in Wikipedia Research you will receive a Research Participation Barnstar after the end of the study. --Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 19:19, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		Research Participation Barnstar
		For your participation in the survey for Anonymity and conformity on the internet. Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 12:53, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

At the start of Pareto distribution it is probably okay to say simply "Pareto distribution" rather than qualify it as Pareto I, because Pareto proposed all of the types I, II, III and all three are named for him. I refer to Kleiber and Kotz for the history and genesis details. Mathstat (talk) 21:44, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes Pareto (IV) is called the generalized Pareto distribution; it has three parameters. The GPD described by Ljubo (1965) has three paramaeters, but it does not resemble what is in the article. Hosking and Wallis (1987) give the equivalent CDF as the one in Continuous Univariate Distributions. I will add the Hosking and Wallis citation to the article, but it does not support the CDF of the article. Compare the definition in this GPD article with the CDF at Generalized extreme value distribution. It looks almost like a copy-paste accident. The two distributions are related, but the relation would be more complicated than what these two pages would suggest. Or maybe I am missing something ... Mathstat (talk) 22:15, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Isheden, Kiefer.Wolfowitz just left you a message on his talk page about sources for Mathematical optimization. (He's blocked at the moment, so he can only edit that page.) If you're interested, the link is User talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz#Mathematical optimization: Combinatorial optimization. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:20, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to report that there were not enough accounts available for you to have one. I have you on our list though and if more become available we will notify you promptly.

We're continually working to bring resources like Credo to Wikipedia editors, and this will very hopefully not be your last opportunity to sign up for one. If you haven't already, please check out WP:HighBeam and WP:Questia, where accounts are still available. Cheers, Ocaasi 19:13, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment. I took the liberty of copying it to the arithmetic talk page, and commented there. --Iantresman (talk) 10:25, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please explain your rationale for removing Category:Salmonidae from Category:Salmon, salmon, trout and other articles. Thanks. --Epipelagic (talk) 22:18, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The main rationale for removing Category:Salmonidae from salmon and trout is that they are not considered taxa (which is what the category comprises according to its description), although all species belong to the Salmonidae family. Moreover, the articles appear to be sufficiently categorized by the remaining categories. An option would be to widen the definition of Category:Salmonidae to something that would include salmon and trout. What's your opinion? Isheden (talk) 10:09, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Isheden; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:03, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Isheden,

You recently undid a modification to the article on Angular frequency and rightfully so. I have updated this modification into the talk section under the title Connections to Oscillatory motion. Please let me know of your criticisms. Jatosado (talk) 02:59, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Isheden, you recently put in a technical move request but didn't specify which page you wanted moved. Please try again, or just let me know here on this page and I'll do what I can. --BDD (talk) 07:17, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What I tried was

• [[:]] → [[:]] (move) – Isheden (talk) 07:30, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't understand why it doesn't work? Isheden (talk) 07:30, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hm. I don't know what you're doing, but no titles are showing up. Why don't you give me the current and proposed titles in plain wikilinks? --BDD (talk) 07:37, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to move Partial fractiontoPartial fraction decomposition. Reason: The term partial fraction is not defined in the article; one normally speaks of partial fraction decomposition (or partial fraction expansion). Isheden (talk) 07:44, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I still don't know what the problem was though. --BDD (talk) 07:57, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

byThe Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:42, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^t|c 15:47, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have received preliminary approval for access to Credo. Please fill out this short form so that your access can be processed. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]