![]() | Ixtal is currently experiencing significant stress that may affect her ability to work on Wikipedia. She may choose to work in quieter areas and avoid complicated tasks or areas prone to conflict. She may also respond to talk page or email messages more slowly than usual, and your patience is greatly appreciated. Thank you. |
![]() | This user's talk page is monitoredbytalk page watchers. Some of them even talk back. Their input is welcome, and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
![]() | This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
|
@ | Should you email me, please let me knowonmy talk page. |
![]() | |
story · music · places |
---|
Today's TFA, Felix M. Warburg House, was written by Vami_IV and Epicgenius, introduced: "This article is about another of the great houses that once lined Fifth Avenue in New York. Specifically, this is the mansion of Felix M. Warburg, a Jewish financier who ignored fears of anti-Semitic reprisal to his decided to build himself a big Gothic manor in the middle of New York City. Although the Warburgs no longer remain, their legacy does: the museum is now the home of the Jewish Museum (Manhattan) and the building largely survives as they left it. It's a beautiful building and I hope you will all enjoy it."! - in memory -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Not sure what more to edit? --AlexBeSweden (talk) 09:51, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello What can i edit? --Okorie Esther Ugochi (talk) 19:32, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
hello --TK lerato (talk) 14:51, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i want to chat with people --TK lerato (talk) 14:51, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
hello --TK lerato (talk) 15:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How do I am creat citation? --Jaggusuperhit (talk) 11:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ixtal, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.
This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:
You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! signed, Rosguill talk 14:32, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).
Guild of Copy Editors June 2024 Newsletter
![]() Hello and welcome to the June 2024 newsletter, a quarterly-ish digest of Guild activities since April. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. Election news: Wanted: new Guild coordinators! If you value and enjoy the GOCE, why not help out behind the scenes? Nominations for our mid-year coordinator election are now open until 23:59 on 15 June (UTC). Self-nominations are welcome. Voting commences at 00:01 on 16 June and continues until 23:50 on 30 June. Results will be announced at the election page. Blitz: Nine of the fourteen editors who signed up for the April 2024 Copy Editing Blitz copy edited at least one article. Between them, they copy edited 55,853 words comprising twenty articles. Barnstars awarded are available here. Drive: 58 editors signed up for our May 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive and 33 of those completed at least one copy edit. 251 articles and 475,952 words were copy edited. Barnstars awarded are here. Blitz: Our June 2024 Copy Editing Blitz will begin on 16 June and finish on 22 June. Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 05:23, 8 June 2024 (UTC) , GOCE copyeditors have completed 161 requests since 1 January and the backlog stands at 2,779 articles. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from Baffle gab1978 and your GOCE coordinators Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Wracking.
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
hi actually my info is wrong @mr.beast page please fix it --PLAYGMAN (talk) 14:51, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello tell me about editing --Dr.M Vincent (talk) 20:23, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! How should I create an external link to the corresponding article on EyeWiki, and also if I should link this at all? Should this be just be "[link INO]" or "[link INO] at EyeWiki" in the same kind of style as the Curlie template or something else? Thanks in advance --3amWednesday (talk) 10:09, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
do Wikipedia answers directly any question you ask?😳
Hi, I am trying to create a Wiki page for https://trinayaninj.org --TrinayaniNJ (talk) 23:57, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there,
I want to add a new article about a new company. How do I do that? Thanks --Abhijeetb88 (talk) 08:38, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How do i add a header to a page? --OliDaHoli (talk) 15:16, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Could you advise me on the last edit. It says the article needs reliae sources, but it is not made clear which items need to be sourced. All current links come from well known universities and publishers. --Nicholas Cusanus (talk) 11:22, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. New to Wikipedia. Can you help with publishing this? --Koning1930 (talk) 18:29, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I am wondering how to set a .gif or .webm to autoplay and loop? (and how I would find this out?). Thanks for you help --Aspir8 (talk) 10:09, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! There was nothing on Wilipedia about this tv and film actor I saw in a series recently so I thought I would make a start. Can you help build this up so we can publish this? Thanks! --Koning1930 (talk) 12:15, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, pls help me with the steps to edit external links --Gayatriakella (talk) 03:38, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting Articles here !! --S4nkissaunty (talk) 17:46, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The third round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 June. As with Round 2, this round was competitive: each of the 16 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 256 points.
The following editors all scored more than 400 points in Round 3:
The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 28 featured articles, 38 featured lists, 240 good articles, 92 in the news credits, and at least 285 did you know credits. They have conducted 279 featured article reviews, as well as 492 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 22 articles to featured topics and good topics.
Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed during Round 4, which starts on 1 July at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ixtal, c/o ping sawyer777 TechnoSquirrel69. The first issues have arisen regarding this competition and reviews, please see Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations#Questionable reviews and this user talk thread. Given there have been significant recent issues surrounding poor WP:GAN reviews, and GAN can be an individual process, this could exacerbate issues there. It would be very helpful if something could be worked up to emphasis the importance of reviews being of good quality even more explicitly, perhaps on the main points table. The 1000 bytes should probably be a minimum, and I might even suggest explicitly requiring 1) a specific mention of each WP:GACR, and 2) explicit mention of source spotchecks (source spotchecks are now a requirement for all GANs so it would be helpful to make that clear here too) at /Scoring. Happy to bounce ideas around, best, CMD (talk) 12:36, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]