Hello, I'm Mahveotm. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edittoJohn Laws (judge)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 06:57, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Jarrvis,
Thanks for your recent edit on the page "Ingando". I'd like to quickly ask what you would consider self-contradictory and whether you could point me to any policies on this - is the mentioning of two different sources with potentially differing claims "self-contradictory". More importantly, what would you do where there exist two different claims by sources which would otherwise be accepted for a single claim, again with reference to Wikipedia policy? Ought one to simply mention one set of claims?
Docentation (talk) 16:08, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Jarrvis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Animalparty! (talk) 05:17, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
The article Durreen Shahnaz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not notable individual, no claims to notability,
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 12:10, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
