Contents

User talk:Jeni/Archives/2017/May

This page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 3 days are automatically archived.

2009
Jan  • Feb  • Mar  • Apr  • May  • Jun
Jul  • Aug  • Sep  • Oct  • Nov  • Dec

2010
Jan  • Feb  • Mar  • Apr  • May  • Jun
Jul  • Aug  • Sep  • Oct  • Nov  • Dec

2011
Jan  • Feb  • Mar  • Apr  • May  • Jun
Jul  • Aug  • Sep  • Oct  • Nov  • Dec

2012
Jan  • Feb  • Mar  • Apr  • May  • Jun
Jul  • Aug  • Sep  • Oct  • Nov  • Dec

2013
Jan  • Feb  • Mar  • Apr  • May  • Jun
Jul  • Aug  • Sep  • Oct  • Nov  • Dec

2014
Jan  • Feb  • Mar  • Apr  • May  • Jun
Jul  • Aug  • Sep  • Oct  • Nov  • Dec

2015
Jan  • Feb  • Mar  • Apr  • May  • Jun
Jul  • Aug  • Sep  • Oct  • Nov  • Dec

2016
Jan  • Feb  • Mar  • Apr  • May  • Jun
Jul  • Aug  • Sep  • Oct  • Nov  • Dec

2017
Jan  • Feb  • Mar  • Apr  • May  • Jun
Jul  • Aug  • Sep  • Oct  • Nov  • Dec

2018
Jan  • Feb  • Mar  • Apr  • May  • Jun
Jul  • Aug  • Sep  • Oct  • Nov  • Dec

2019
Jan  • Feb  • Mar  • Apr  • May  • Jun
Jul  • Aug  • Sep  • Oct  • Nov  • Dec

Why are you here?

1. You are hacked off because I nominated one of your articles for deletion - This isn't the place to discuss it, I strongly suggest taking it up in the appropriate AfD discussion or on the articles talk page.
2. You are replying to a message I left on your talk page - Don't reply here! Reply on your talk page, I'll be watching!
3. You want to discuss an article - If it is an article I have previously contributed to, it is likely to be on my watchlist, consider starting a discussion there instead, it may generate more discussion from outside parties.
4. You think I'm harassing you - Unlikely. I have over 20,000 pages on my watchlist, including every UK place, road, bus operator and bus route (and most rail articles). If you edit the same group of articles, we are bound to bump into each other!
5. You actually wish to talk to me - Welcome! You are in the right place, start a new discussion at the bottom of the page!

I found your name at Category:User js (probably because you posted the corresponding userbox on your user page), in the level-unspecified list of JavaScript programmers.

I was wondering how experienced you are at JavaScript, and whether you might be interested in getting involved with developing user scripts, hobnobbing with other JavaScript programmers, and organizing and improving JavaScript articles and support pages.

We do all of that and more at the JavaScript WikiProject.

Scripts undergoing development, and the state of JavaScript on Wikipedia, are discussed on the talk page.

For an overview of JavaScript coverage on Wikipedia, see Draft:Outline of JavaScript and Index of JavaScript-related articles. For everything on user scripts, see User:The Transhumanist/Outline of scripts.

The WikiProject also organizes every resource it can find about JavaScript out there, such as articles, books, tutorials, etc. See our growing Reference library. If you know of any good ones, please add them.

If you would like to join the JavaScript WikiProject, feel free to add your name to the participants list.

Hope to see you there! The Transhumanist 16:58, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you read the history, you will see that I was merely returning the article to its original consistent state. It is you who is being disruptive. ----Ehrenkater (talk) 19:30, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're introducing inconsistencies in the style of English, in two different consecutive edits you introduced British English then changed something else to American English. It's quite simple really. The title of the page is the British English version, that will tell you everything you need to know. Jeni ^(talk) 19:32, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) @Ehrenkater: FYI, Please read WP:ENGVAR. Regards, Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 10:18, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is silly.

1. I didn't introduce British English. I initially reverted one change by another user from American to British English, because the rest of the article was in American English.

2. You then insisted that the article should be in British English, on dubious grounds.

3. I went along with that and changed a couple of other words to British English.----Ehrenkater (talk) 12:40, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't introduce British English? Just admit you were wrong and move on, everyone else has. Jeni ^(talk) 12:50, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]