Contents

User talk:Jeremiah Mountain

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  -FisherQueen (Talk) 21:03, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did some searching on Proctor (I's heard about him at my church, too), but it was hard to find any third-party sources that mention him, and that's the big problem. If there were an article about him somewhere other than on his own web site, or one that promotes him (like Logos) and his seminars, that would help. If there are magazine articles (like Christianity Today) or newspaper articles, that's even better. You might could do it as a stub, but make it about Proctor, not just about the seminars. Add {{Christianity-stub}} to the bottom. It may be tough — Wikipedia's notability standards are somewhat subjective by nature, so there's no guarantee you won't be deleted. The best-written article in the world won't make the cut if the subject isn't notable. Let me know if I can help. Realkyhick 02:07, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I just found a good link. Cut and paste this into your new article:

==References==

*[http://www.christianitytoday.com/yc/2001/003/6.46.html Your Church/ChtistianityToday.com: "The Immediate Bible: New software brings the Scripture to life in seconds," by Quentin Wagenfield, May/June 2001]

That should help greatly. Let me know when you've posted this and I'll "purty it up real nice." Realkyhick 02:17, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know where in Tennessee that Proctor is a pastor? Otherwise it's good. Realkyhick 01:39, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thnaks for pointing out to me that there are two different Living Word Fellowships, and that the Tipton book referenced the one founded by Pastor Bobbi. I note that Living Word Fellowship currently redirects to The Living Word Fellowship. Given that they are two different organizations, founder Stevens vs. founder Pastor Bobbi, I suspect that we need a disambiguation page instead of a redirect, even if it is only two notable Christian fellowships under that name. Also, it was pointed out to me that a Google search reveals a number of probably non-notable organizations that also use "Living Word Fellowship" in their names. What do you think? --Bejnar (talk)

i completely agree :) xxx Jessi1989 (talk) 22:18, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did a bit of searching and learned that films from Sunchaser win awards. So, I cleaned up, expanded, wikified and sourced the article. Because of coverage of their projects in the media, specially when this coverage mentions Sunchaser and/or the Sinchaser founder as the production company of winning films, it passes WP:Corp. I have let the nom know. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:42, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blake Fitzpatrick due to a withdrawal by the nominator. However there were several delete votes, including you. My rational for closing the debate can be found on the AfD page. If you still wish for this to go through AfD, please renominate, and let me know. Thanks. DARTHPANDA^duel 21:14, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Phil Cooke.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:09, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - I just wanted to let you know I appreciate you dropping in to Lydia Davydova and for kindly tidying up after my half-asleep editing! I do feel the poor girl is rather neglected outside Russia and it's cheering to see someone helping to take good care of her (so to speak). Do you have a particular interest in Russian musicians, or is it singers in general? Alfietucker (talk) 23:36, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stanley R. Zupnik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanley R. Zupnik until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Deunanknute (talk) 22:50, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited R. G. Spurling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Church of God. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tonga College, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nominationbyvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Nicnote (talk) 17:12, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mastering (audio), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steve Hoffman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin Gray (mastering engineer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Gray (mastering engineer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 15:50, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morris Proctor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sarrail (talk) 05:32, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]