Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Muslim history. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. bwowen talk•contribs 23:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Old Dan Tucker. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Nucleusboy 18:02, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Bruce Springsteen. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TraxPlayer 22:52, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Bruce Springsteen, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Cordless Larry 17:02, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Johnhenry, your edits appear to be something less than helpful. It might be a good idea to look over some articles about topics you know something about but don't have a strong point of view on. I'll bet you could make them better, even if it's just by fixing grammar or spelling.
If you're going to add things like Bruce's affair with his now-wife, be sure to include a citation. Without it, you run afoul of Wikipedia's rules about biographies of living persons. (The wiki-shorthand is BLP).
If you're moved to redefine "progressive" as "code word for extreme left-wing" please resist the motivation.
If you're out to call somebody names (i.e. "over-the-hill"), please find a playground and some schoolchildren. David in DC 03:19, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
