Contents

User talk:Juventas

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! 

Xiner (talk, email) 22:58, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm currently still working on the MultiUser Talk information... I was working on sorting out the redirects and disambiguation pages earlier. I'm not really sure that it would be correct to describe MUT as simply a BBS chat program but it is certainly the predecessor to modern IRC. As much as I'd like to make a separate article for MultiUser Talk, there really doesn't seem to be enough information about MUT left to compile a standalone article, so what I was working on would still be included in Internet Relay Chat. Tothwolf (talk) 03:41, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm starting to agree that MUT was not significant enough to warrant its own article. I'm attempting to contact the program's author to see if he can provide any insight. I don't understand the hesitation with the short description I added. As I'm sure you've already read from Jarkko Oikarinen himself: ...OuluBox (a Public Access BBS running on host tolsun.oulu.fi, administered by me)... and ...existing simple multiuser chat program on OuluBox was MUT (MultiUser Talk)... Seems pretty straight-forward. Juventas (talk) 04:33, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In a recent edit, you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Diannaa ^(Talk) 03:52, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. I went back to the original flickr file here and the photographer has them tagged as stockings, so I think I just went by that. Johntex\^talk 16:18, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you go to Emdot's photostream and search on the word "stockings", that picture comes up. I don't know how that search works compared to the tags. Maybe he changed the tags at some point? Johntex\^talk 19:41, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Prod declined" means someone placed a prod tag on it and someone else removed it. If you can find a source saying the Yellow tape went platninum, then add it — going platinum even in Canada, where the numbers for platinum are pretty low, is a valid assertation of notability. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 16:49, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I already added a reference for that. Is it a bad reference? --Juventas (talk) 19:10, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, that's fine. I've removed The Yellow Tape from the discussion since it now has a valid assertation of standalone notability. The other two still stand. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 19:55, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	I think this suits you :) --AliciaTanROX (talk) 02:20, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted an edit of yours on Hybrid Drives, then I thought better of it, realizing that what I really was upset because I wanted further clarification on the page as to the significance (and limits of) the distinction between the two. rather than because your edit wasn't a smart thing to do. I'll go do that. You can see the edit history of this page to see my increasingly hedging train of thought like this. :p --Monk of the highest order^(t) 07:05, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your effort on the article. I hope Talk:Ultrabook/Archives/2012#Dual_drives clearly explains the difference. In retrospect, those models probably should of had a footnote to begin with. --Juventas (talk) 08:42, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]