Contents

User talk:Lambsbridge

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Moldova–European Union Association Agreement page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've rewritten it a bit more in the hope of clarifying without confusing. --OJ (talk) 11:26, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's been edited a couple of times since, but definitely a good idea. It's easy to forget what needs clarification when you're really into something. Thanks! Lambsbridge (talk) 18:35, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I'm getting close to an edit war with an IP editor (no 24 hour rule violations, so I think we're technically good?). They keep editing the Accession of North Macedonia to NATO page to say that the UK House of Commons approved the relevant treaty on 16 October 2019. I've reverted a few times becuase that isn't true, and provided sources on the article talk page published by the UK parliament that show that they certainly didn't approve the treaty on that date, and that they generally don't vote on approving treaties at all. Despite trying to signpost my talk page post, I can't get them to engage at all - they just keep putting back the incorrect information. I think they're acting in general good faith, as they cite a Macedonian news article that suggests that supports their edit, but unfortunately this is an area with a lot of sloppy journalism - even when journalists are talking about their own country's legal ratification steps! I don't want to turn this into an edit war, but all of the dispute resolution mechanisms I can find either require discussion (which I can't get the other editor to engage in), a conduct issue (I'm not sure this is quite that), or both. What can I do to make sure the article stays accurate without engaging in unproductive behavior?

Lambsbridge (talk) 22:36, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

While the IP editor hasn't commented on the talk page, some other editors have. They provided suggestions on how to proceed, though apparently they haven't implemented them yet. If you agree with those suggestions, you can implement them; otherwise you can discuss the issue with those editors until you reach a consensus and then implement that. If the IP editor goes against that consensus, the page can, if necessary, be semi-protected; see WP:RFPP. Huon (talk) 23:11, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I see the other editors' posts now, although I could swear I've looked there since it says the comments were made, and I didn't see them. I'll see if I can get that consensus now that there's some more people involved, and hopefully we wont need semi-protection.Lambsbridge (talk) 23:15, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Brownout (electricity has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 3 § Brownout (electricity until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 21:25, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]