This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | → | Archive 25 |
Rayvision is one of the leading render farm in the world. Rayvision was the render farm for the famous blockbuster movies Bahubali and Krissh 3 and MR Hublot the oscar winning animation movie is also rendered by Rayvision. Please check the website to know more details about it
Please tell sir what I did that is vandalizing Knick7136 (talk) 02:34, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Im sorry to bother you but, Deadly Deposits needs to have a page because it is a NFB film and it was directed by Jay Falconer. Im so sorry about that :(. Remington Tufflips (talk) 16:17, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Alright :( Remington Tufflips (talk) 17:07, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
This is the first Prental Yoga Book in Slovenia. It is important for all Yoginis all over the world and for all the countries that are still improving their yoga position in their countries.
It will be soon translated into German and English Language.
The translated title is Prenatal Yoga - Yogic Guide for safe and active Pregnancy
Delete 'The Fakir (2016 film)' John8944 (talk) 15:04, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
I found some books by the author Khalil Salem in Brazilian libraries. The works can also be viewed by the National Library (Brazil) page, and attributed delicate notoriety to the author (the author has nearly twenty books). However, all the works are written only in Portuguese, except one text (a chapter) in English. Furthermore, the two books cited in the article do not exist in English. I believe the writer has scientific relevance, but the books, when they appear in English, should be avoided or deleted depending on the case. Thanks for your cooperation and scientific spirit. - Jupiter's Spiritualist (talk) 23:25, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Okamialvis. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Dmitry Miller, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Okamialvis (talk) 09:21, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
If there are links that do not fall within the guideline, why not just remove the link vs the entire page (the history). It falls short of revisionist history (e.g. letting 1 bad link erase the entire historical record) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Food Follower (talk • contribs) 09:27, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Perhaps I am not understanding, how is the Wikipedia page promotional. What aspect is promotional. If there are, then delete the sections /links that appears
it is not an opinion it is a fact based on true star wars books movie and gorge lucas interviews so F you to if you and the other people on wiki won't let me put this up just like with my NFS prostreet cheets because I can always just repost then. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nico4201 (talk • contribs) 17:28, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
I would but this works better to get the word out because no body finds my stuff on other websites, and please don't delete my user page or sandboxand ESPECIALLY not my account becasue I can alway make a new one >:) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nico4201 (talk • contribs) 17:58, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
hi largoplazo you get wrong I want to change my count name but i didin't know how if you don't mind please guide me how to do that — Preceding unsigned comment added by سبيرز (talk • contribs) 20:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Republia times is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republia times until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mackensen (talk) 01:18, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
I'm trying to leave you a message-I don't use this. John Heard is my ex he has no child named Taylor Mae, we have two children together Max, born 2-24-94, and Annika Rose born 10-19-95. I'd like Taylor Mae taken down he has no child of this name it was a prank. Jack (Johnny Matthew is also his son, my childrens brother). Thank you. And I want the arrest taken down that is not necessary at all. It was done by another lunatic. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darknesslightness101 (talk • contribs) 03:10, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Yes... we have WP:Bite...but he wasn't exactly a newbie I think. Cheeers. Lectonar (talk) 18:47, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Given your high fluency in Polish, I am reaching out to you in regards to the History of the Poles in the United States article. It has no Polish equivalent, and any time you can spend towards translating in any capacity would be much-appreciated. I would be more than happy to help any way that I can.
Thank you! Pola.mola (talk) 20:13, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Shwas home is a notable business in kochi,kerala,india — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhilashsnair (talk • contribs) 05:43, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello, just asking a quick question, what page does the autobiography template come from? I've tried looking for it multiple times, but haven't found it yet. Thanks. JumpiMaus (talk) 19:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
I'm still adding citations currently. any advice would be appreciated. NeuroproteXeon (talk) 20:40, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
I sure understand your perspective.
With respect to Anschutz Small Bore Target Match 54 Action,
I just learned within the 20 series square receiver section,
in addition to the standard run of 2007/660 in stock 213 Aluminum manufactured during 2002,
There's a specific model of Anschutz target rifle called a 2007/660 with a stainless steel barrel and a color Aluminum stock, a marketing test series manufactured by Anschutz and marketed in the U.S.
There were six of this model, two in red, two in blue and two in black.
I'm just trying to add to the previously blank page with only the title 2002/660 in stock 2313 Alu.
Maybe I'm just confusing you more.
Does this help at all ?
Bill
I sure understand your perspective.
With respect to Anschutz Small Bore Target Match 54 Action,
I just learned within the 20 series square receiver section,
in addition to the standard run of 2007/660 in stock 213 Aluminum manufactured during 2002,
There's a specific model of Anschutz target rifle called a 2007/660 with a stainless steel barrel and a color Aluminum stock, a marketing test series manufactured by Anschutz and marketed in the U.S.
There were six of this model, two in red, two in blue and two in black.
I'm just trying to add to the previously blank page with only the title 2002/660 in stock 2313 Alu.
Maybe I'm just confusing you more.
Does this help at all ?
Bill
Flemish is a word with too many meanings, too many definitions, too much history of change. I re-added current so that the reader can be aware that while the language of Belgium may not officially be Flemish, there are still Flemish speakers in the world. They may wonder why "current" is repeated and pursue their question. There is a discussion at the articles talk page. Buster Seven Talk 18:45, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
You wrote that the Modern seems to have been around since 1946 in relation to Nanaimo Bars. Nanaimo Bars have been around significantly longer than that; some reports state that they were actually an ENGLISH dessert that was shipped to Nanaimo where there was a coal mine in which many British men came to work. Nanaimo Bars could survive the trip. (Apparently they didn't use the same butter-based middle that I do now, I'm just saying). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.140.45.175 (talk) 08:04, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I see you warned a user about creating inappropriate pages regarding the article LoudLizard. Could you tell me what was on that page, please? It seems to be about me. Thanks, LoudLizard (talk) 19:22, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
I know a lot of editors don't seem to be aware of general references, and think a link is only a reference if it has an inline citation (of course, if the link doesn't support the article, then it isn't a reference). I've been looking through the unreferenced articles categories and a lot of them actually do have sources. The no footnotes template is more appropriate for those articles, but as there are so many of them, it would be a hell of a job to put it right. Adam9007 (talk) 17:21, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Sorry about any confusion. I saw the editor had made some further vandalism, but got distracted IRL when doing the diff. When I got back quite a while later and reverted, the revert failed due to later changes but I didn't initially notice and added a vandalism note. Thanks for catching it and reverting more! Stephenb (Talk) 16:28, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
It was my mistake, sorry. I agree with deleation of article『Крамонд (стоянка)』from en.wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VSL56 (talk • contribs) 21:07, 9 March 2016 (UTC) VSL56 (talk) 21:14, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Possibly, changing the title of the article “Functional food definition by FFC” to “Functional Food Definition” since the title is too over precise would be beneficial. Although similar, "functional foods" and "Functional food definition" are different subjects. Functional food definition brings attention to scientists, governmental agencies, and the food industry to have the same correct understanding of the subject, so that government can then regulate the issues related to functional foods and related to that of health claims. The Functional Food Center (FFC) has been working in this area since 2004. Also, I changed the article outline and provided other definitions and history of outcome of functional food definitions. Functional food definition could include more extensive history or regulations added later.
Published scientific articles mention FFC's definition as opposed to others’ definitions. Surely, more could be added to the full the article of functional food: it's history, status and regulations of functional foods in Japan, EU, as well as in USA. DanikMartirosyan (talk) 18:41, 11 March 2016 (UTC)DanikMartirosyan
Hi
I'm new to wiki and I noticed some errors in "Persian alphabet".
The table in section Letters is a mess. The Unicode codepoints for contextual forms are used arbitrarily. Some isolated forms are the "basic letter" codepoints but some are from "forms codepoints".This is a bad edit that's not been undone although the next edit from the same IP has been undone. I corrected a letter order problem there but I think it needs a good cleanup.
I'm a newbie and this is a large edit(I guess?).
My question is, can I make the changes myself or should I send them to someone, like you, to apply?
Thanks
Jvd fa (talk) 06:11, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
please give me 5-10 minutes before deciding to deactiviate — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrsRichelle (talk • contribs) 20:04, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello Largoplazo. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1), content (CSD A3), or significance (CSD A7) moments after they are created, as you did at Rupayan Dey. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. - MrX 20:15, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi Largoplazo,
I have included a credible reference on the wiki page I created. Thank you.
Michelleagy (talk) 06:04, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello Largoplazo, there are now 21 citations for the Ross Tomson article. Please assist in the removal of the deletion request and aid in verification and cleanup of the article, as you have been doing. The article should be in compliance and we only strive to provide accurate information regarding who Ross Tomson is.
Thank you. Tomsontech (talk) 20:06, 21 March 2016 (UTC)Tomsontech (namechange pending)
There are numerous citations to articles written by others about Ross Tomson and his companies. See the Houston Business Journal citation, Rice News citation, Offshore magazine citation, Energy.gov citation, and the Texas Bar citation -- all of which are independent sources not tied to Tomson, but written about him or his companies. Tomsontech (talk) 20:34, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Sorry about that! I'm still learning some of the nuances of Wikipedia. Thank you for the correction! --Erick Shepherd (talk) 01:51, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Decoriya, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nominationbyvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mean as custard (talk) 15:50, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi Largoplazo,
I am new here and want to be a contribute to Wikipedia. but why to delete a new page that I just created? Is a website with thousands of fans cant be included in Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eyalshalom (talk • contribs) 15:56, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi Largo,
I believe the Classic Learning Test does meet the notability criteria of Wikipedia. The CLT is accepted as a standard for admission at eight colleges, some of which are very notable, such as Thomas Aquinas College, which is rated 30th by U.S. News and World Report for "Best Value Colleges". The article does not promote the test, it simply provides some unbiased information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JeremyTate14 (talk • contribs) 13:58, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Same BLP content posted as Tennis Federation Bunshinsaba by same author. Previously posted multiple times as Carp scale, and as Carp scales. I have opened an SPI on Odssss (talk · contribs) as a likely sock of Dsfsswec (talk · contribs). FYI, regards --220 of Borg 10:01, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
this is bradly294 you left me a message about my thingy i left on Ann E Wehlre talk page. I wanted to get feed back on my proposed edits I'm planning to do to her page. do you nave any suggestion to where to put this proposed edits where i can get feedback from the community? this is my first time editing wikipedia. I'm doing it for a class. thank you for helping. --Bradl294 (talk) 20:33, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your reply! I am trying to edit the content and it keeps giving me an error message. Can you please tell me what I am doing wrong so I do not receive the error messages anymore?
Thanks! Manar
Way too fast my curvy pink butt. It was clearly going to be an aoutobiog of a nudnik, as additional edits proved.TheLongTone (talk) 14:40, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
I respect that and have the highest respect for wikipedia for checking sources and editing posted articles or notes. It does indeed make it relevant. However, I think there is a big difference between posting something that is non-factual and posting something which you (or any administrator) deems not important enough, or that you simply don't think meets the guidelines for wikipedia. When an episode about one of the most notorious stalkers in the US is about to air I don't see why creating a page about the actor is irrelevant.
Quite frankly, wikipedia is not just about facts and history as an encyclopedia is, but goes beyond this to find out about significant events or people and indeed even the ones portraying the people. Why else would there be a page about some local politician named Tom Bates, as there is for a Berkely, CA politician. Not a significant player for encyclopedic literature, but is in the world of wikipedia. Because it is an invaluable source for getting to know one another.
I respect that and have the highest respect for wikipedia for checking sources and editing posted articles or notes. It does indeed make it relevant. However, I think there is a big difference between posting something that is non-factual and posting something which you (or any administrator) deems not important enough, or that you simply don't think meets the guidelines for wikipedia. When an episode about one of the most notorious stalkers in the US is about to air I don't see why creating a page about the actor is irrelevant.
Quite frankly, wikipedia is not just about facts and history as an encyclopedia is, but goes beyond this to find out about significant events or people and indeed even the ones portraying the people. Why else would there be a page about some local politician named Tom Bates, as there is for a Berkely, CA politician. Not a significant player for encyclopedic literature, but is in the world of wikipedia. Because it is an invaluable source for getting to know one another.
I respect that and have the highest respect for wikipedia for checking sources and editing posted articles or notes. It does indeed make it relevant. However, I think there is a big difference between posting something that is non-factual and posting something which you (or any administrator) deems not important enough, or that you simply don't think meets the guidelines for wikipedia. When an episode about one of the most notorious stalkers in the US is about to air I don't see why creating a page about the actor is irrelevant.
Quite frankly, wikipedia is not just about facts and history as an encyclopedia is, but goes beyond this to find out about significant events or people and indeed even the ones portraying the people. Why else would there be a page about some local politician named Tom Bates, as there is for a Berkely, CA politician. Not a significant player for encyclopedic literature, but is in the world of wikipedia. Because it is an invaluable source for getting to know one another.
TomBates101 (talk) 18:43, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Also Largoplazo, I refer to criticism you have previously been given, and do note that my article did not violate any copyright, have any blatant nonsense, or have any attack in it. But do review critiques you have been given please:
March 2016
Information icon Hello Largoplazo. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1), content (CSD A3), or significance (CSD A7) moments after they are created, as you did at Rupayan Dey. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. - MrX 20:15, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
TomBates101 (talk) 18:49, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello
Thanks for your helps but i have translated the main document to spanish version as its not exist and should be listed under spanish version .
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Solutions Resource, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bellevue and Washington. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello Largo Plazo, thank you for information. Best regards. --AlexArago (talk) 16:46, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dato Sri Tahir. Since you had some involvement with the Dato Sri Tahir redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 02:12, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi Larg
You have deleted page which i created early. Please tell me where you find the promotional content in my article. https://en.wikipedia.orgwiki/Helpchat — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ranganathancse (talk • contribs) 05:40, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Please check the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Helpchat page. give me suggestion for writing. I wrote what what ever that app is doing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ranganathancse (talk • contribs) 15:07, 25 April 2016 (UTC)