Contents

User talk:Lawaspirant5580

Hi! Just spotted this edit, and you are correct, there is no such parameter as "box office" for the film infobox. However, this can be replaced with "gross" instead. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 08:09, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Lugnuts:This is an interesting point that I thought I knew but grew increasingly skeptical about as I was editing these infoboxes the other day. I read through some of the archive discussions on the Template:Infobox film talk pages and the number of comments about if box office and/or gross included home video distributions intake, post-release features, merchandising, etc., etc. seemed non-conclusory. So although I originally assumed the gross and box office were fungible, I'm still not 100% if the number reflected in an incorrectly declared BO param is an accurate reflection of actual accepted gross (i.e. IMDb-sourced or some other). In this instance, you're clearly right and the two are interchangeable - I'll admit I didn't pay enough attention to the supporting ref; however, I'll admit to a degree of ongoing skepticism for unsourced BO numbers. Lawaspirant5580 (talk) 16:19, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for the ping. I'm not sure if you look at WT:FILM, but the box office issue is a current hot topic, with these posts being the most recent about the current issues: (one, two). Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 16:22, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Lugnuts:Great sources, I hadn't gotten quite that far into it yet. Thanks for the references.Lawaspirant5580 (talk) 16:24, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just as an FYI as your edit on Sam Craigie - the current ranking is generated from Template:Infobox snooker player/rankings. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:27, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Annapurna (goddess), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lawaspirant5580. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "University of California".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:51, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:University of California, Davis fellows has been nominated for upmerging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:51, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John M. York until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BD2412 T 16:08, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lawaspirant5580. Thank you for your work on Michigan Journal of International Law. Trainsskyscrapers, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Consistent with formatting of other law journals, contains relevant inline citations and a suitable number of categories, and is organized in an aesthetically-pleasing manner.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Trainsskyscrapers}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 20:14, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]