Contents

User talk:Maethordaer

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! J Milburn (talk) 10:35, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletions are limited to a specific set of topics: persons; groups; web content. There is no speedy criterion for product: album, book, program, software, etc. The radio show is a product, not a group, and thus did not qualify (however non-notable) for a speedy. --Orange Mike | Talk 02:29, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, he's been doing it more. That edit was made before the AC one, so i'll assume good faith and that he isn't deliberately trying to flip the birdie at my warning. Thanks for the heads-up, though. Ironholds (talk) 14:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

heh, thats ok, I do it myself sometimes. Post a new section, realise there's a SP error, hit backspace to ammend it and realise I've now posted the whole thing twice. Ironholds (talk) 14:45, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hi, Maethordaer, please see, Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions for weasel arguments, for weasel phrasing there is a tag {{Weasel}} , not referenced is not an argument to delete an article, setting it back to former state [[1]] , the lead problem is noted on the talkpage, retagging it with cleanup/unreferenced is also an option. Cheers Mion (talk) 00:34, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done, your page analysis was good, a quick fix is applied. cheers Mion (talk) 01:00, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have contested the prod because I showed notability. The article being an autobiography is not a good reason for deletion. Schuym1 (talk) 17:47, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but in regards to the Sectionalism article, I never edit that page and I think your message is invalid. Please be careful when tagging articles with the prod. tag and be sure you have the right users next time. Thanks. --eric (mailbox) 05:02, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unicorn144 (talk) 15:58, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments about the map of South Lebanon. I can think of an easy way you can use it - it's actually a slightly modified version of a United Nations map. If you include it in your work and cite it as "Adapted from United Nations Map No. 4144" you should be fine. -- ChrisO (talk) 10:32, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to let you know that an article that you added prod2 to is now listed for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Education loans: How to plan and manage loan repayment. Deli nk (talk) 17:48, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Maethordaer! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]