Were you the writer of the "gram per litre" Wikipedia entry?
RobZombi3 (talk) 03:30, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Constantin Budeanu, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.iec.ch/cgi-bin/tl_to_htm.pl?section=person&item=77.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:36, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 | On8 February 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Otto Redlich, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Otto Redlich published the Redlich–Kwong equation of state in 1949? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 06:05, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Photoelectrochemistry, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://goldbook.iupac.org/P04607.html.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:24, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A sandbox is a personal user space for article development. Therefore it cannot be assumed that the development has reached the stage where the article can go live. You should not have done what you did. There are errors to be corrected and things still to be done in the sandbox. I deeply resent your intervention. Petergans (talk) 08:51, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Electrochemistry journals, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Crusio (talk) 12:06, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and thanks for creating the journal stubs. Please watch out though when citing the impact factor. You write them like 3,234 which is wrong in English numericals because a comma is the separator for the thousands digit, not the decimal sign. The impact factors are decimal numbers though as you can read e.g. on the journals' homepages. And please don't just link to the Journal Citation Reports article on Wikipedia but also include a weblink to any site that states the actual number. Linking the wiki-article is a self reference which is not very helpful and shall be avoided. Otherwise keep up the good work. Happy editing, De728631 (talk) 16:22, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
The Modest Barnstar | |
| Thanks for your recent contributions! -129.49.72.78 (talk) 19:10, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
A tag has been placed on Excess molar quantity, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ikh007 (talk) 12:31, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
http://quizlet.com/4044160/chemvocab-flash-cards/ says this about triazene: "Triazene, also known as triazanylene, is an unsaturated inorganic compound having the chemical formula N3H3. It has one double bond, and is the second simplest member of the azene class of hydronitrogen compounds, and is not found in nature." In any case triphosphene is not notable as the corresponding triphosphine, so I revised the article without plagiarising.--Smokefoot (talk) 01:28, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article Petru Bogdan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravendrop 06:44, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Inelastic neutron scattering, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phase (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:02, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Molar concentration, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reciprocal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:31, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Electric sonic amplitude, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dispersion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:21, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harold Friedman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stony Brook (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The article Liquid metal electrode has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unclear, unreferenced stub. Subject is notable, but content couldn't be verified.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:05, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
