|
what part of the page you read- Glen Dillon is dead... satusuro 13:42, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bœsenbiesen has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Matzenheim. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
{{Help me}}onyour talk page and someone will drop by to help.Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Achenheim has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Your recent editing history at Lucerne shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
See talk-page on de::Luzern ZH8000 (talk) 14:20, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed that you have posted comments to the page here in a language other than English. At the English-language Wikipedia, we try to use English for all comments. Posting all comments in English makes it easier for other editors to join the conversation and help you. If you cannot avoid using another language, then please provide a translation into English, if you can. If you cannot provide a translation, please go to the list of Wikipedias, look in the list for a Wikipedia that is in your language, and edit there instead of here. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. ZH8000 (talk) 14:40, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please add whatever you can to:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Scicluna_1.jpg
Thanks. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 00:40, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
