Hello, I'm Cordless Larry. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Maryam Moshiri, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:04, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Maryam Moshiri. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 16:33, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Traitors (American season 1), you may be blocked from editing. Eternal Shadow Talk 17:07, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Maryam Moshiri. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:16, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:01, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history at Dancing on Ice shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:01, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Love Island: All-Stars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Airdrie. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:50, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
