Contents

User talk:Mikeyp72

Hello and welcometoWikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! S Philbrick(Talk) 12:53, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Appreciate the links, many thanks, these will obviously help me, so that's great.

Mikeyp72 (talk) 16:24, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mikeyp72! Your additions to 743 Naval Air Squadron have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• Ifyou own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:19, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Diannaa, Understood. Thanks for providing the points above. I'll also read through the guidance from the links within. If I do have any questions, re copyright, I'll come back to you. Mikeyp72 (talk) 14:13, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mikeyp72. You've added "Sturtivant, Ballance 2016" to 764 Naval Air Squadron, but it's undefined in the article. Did you mean "The Squadrons of The Fleet Air Arm - Sturtivant, Ballance 1994" or "The Squadrons and Units of the Fleet Air Arm - Ballance 2016"? -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 18:25, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ActivelyDisinterested, great spot. I meant the latter. "The Squadrons and Units of the Fleet Air Arm - Ballance 2016". Shouldn't have included the name Sturtivant. Mikeyp72 (talk) 20:59, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mikeyp72. Sorry to bother you again but 719 Naval Air Squadron is missing a cite for "Wragg 2019". -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 19:48, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ActivelyDisinterested, thanks. I forgot to add the reference source to the bibliography. All done now! Mikeyp72 (talk) 21:29, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry again, at 756 Naval Air Squadron should Ballance 2019beWragg 2019? I can't find a Balance 2019 work. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 20:30, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies I need to concentrate! It should be Wragg and I have amended it to reflect the correct author. Thanks. Mikeyp72 (talk) 06:12, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, the error messages should be much more prominent. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 14:03, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

With this edit to RNAS Dale (HMS Goldcrest) edit, the article doesn't need a separate units section. That was there only as a temporary measure until the information was written as prose which is the preferred way on Wikipedia, see MOS:USEPROSE for more info. The section needs to be removed.

We only keep separate unit sections in active miltiary bases like RAF Coningsby#Based units.

Gavbadger (talk) 19:09, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gavbadger,

Apologies, only just seen this note. Thanks for the feedback and guidance as I am newish to this. Understood - only units in active bases have their own section. Mikeyp72 (talk) 21:03, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Your latest edit to the Coastal Command Anti U-Boat Devices School RAF article link here, you added a link to List of communications units and formations of the Royal Air Force for No. 12 Radio School, in future could you please either redirect it to the correct section within the list using #Radio Schools or by use the No. 12 Radio School RAF redirect. Thanks Gavbadger (talk) 19:41, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good spot and thanks, will change and remember for future similar links. Thanks Mikeyp72 (talk) 20:08, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mikeyp72. Thank you for your work on No. 131 (Coastal) Operational Training Unit RAF. User:Hydronium Hydroxide, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please add appropriate wikiprojects to the talk pages of articles you create to attract attention of interested editors.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hydronium Hydroxide}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 09:05, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Hydronium Hydroxide: Hi Hydronium Hydroxide, thanks for the tip! I shall ensure to add the appropriate wikiprojects to the talk pages in future Many thanks Mikeyp72 (talk) 11:25, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the new article - patrolling new articles, a nicely researched, well put together contribution is a surprisingly rare thing and it was a joy to find! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:39, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexandermcnabb Thanks for the feedback, and for taking the time to do this note to me, its nice to see a positive comment, much appreciated. Kind regards, Mikeyp72 (talk) 08:04, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mikeyp72. Thank you for your work on No. 5 (Coastal) Operational Training Unit RAF. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:18, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn: Hi SunDawn, thanks for reaching out to me after going through my article. All the best to you and your family Mikeyp72 (talk) 14:32, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be an authority on these. Is it possible that you have information about the Pwllheli Target, a large tripod structure in the sea between Pwllheli and Abersoch. It was huge, and no documentation exists that I have found so far. It was removed in the late 1960s and no obvious trace remains, certainly above the waves. It is said to have been a bombing target. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:17, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtrent: That's a new one one me, I haven't heard of the Pwllheli Target. I have been reading about the ranges and airfields situated on the Lŷn peninsular, particularly Hell's Mouth, Penrhos and Llandwrog and haven't come across that. When I read your note I immediately wondered if it was something relating to Penrhos, but can't find anything! Mikeyp72 (talk) 15:32, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are also large cement arrows, pointing "to it" flat on the ground in the coastline adjoining Pwllheli and/or Abersoch that have been reported to me. A friend found them using Google Earth

The target was enormous. It was used as a racing mark by Pwllheli Sailing Club and South Carnarvon Yacht Club. I've sailed round it often. It was of substantial height made of large diameter steel tubes (at least .75m diameter). 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:44, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was at 52°50′46″N 4°25′45″W / 52.846024°N 4.429071°W / 52.846024; -4.429071 or thereabouts. This is a guess from the late 1960s! An old Admiralty chart will show it, but I don't have any 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:03, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mikeyp72. Thank you for your work on No. 1 Torpedo Training Unit RAF. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:32, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent work, uploading all these Wing Leader details. However, there appears to be an error in your source material concerning No. 52 TBR Wing, as Lt Comm Fox served BEFORE Lt Comm Rance, who remained Wing Leader until it was disbanded. I believe the correct order should be: (1) Shrubsole (26 Nov 43); (2) Britton (5 Jan 44); (3) Fox (24 Jan 44); (4) Rance (15 Feb 44). My sources are below. I would be happy to upload these amendments, or you might prefer to do so yourself? Best, Mike. 1. Lt Comm Fox’s entry in the list of FAA Commanding Officers 1939-45 states “Wing Leader 52nd Wing briefly in spring 1944, prior to the attacks on the battleship Tirpitz”(see http://fleetairarmarchive.net/RollofHonour/COs/CommandingOfficers-f.htm ); 2. Fox left his former role as CO of 830 NAS for a Wing Leader role in the second half of January 44 ( see “Wings Over the Waves - Fleet Air Arm Strike Leader Against Tirpitz”, Graham Drucker’s biography of Lt Cdr Roy Baker-Falkner : page 290 (“15 January. I have just heard that Richard Kingdon is coming up here to take over command of one of the squadrons [830 NAS] in my wing”) and page 291 (“Saturday [29/1/44]. I told you that Fox has left us and got his own party [ie Wing] like me”. 3. Britton became Wing Leader of No. 2 and No. 12 TBR Wings on 24 Jan 44, so this would be the logical date for Fox to commence his brief command of No. 52 TBR Wing. (Clearly Britton’s tenure at No. 52 TBR Wing was even more temporary). 4. Rance’s previous role as CO of 831 NAS ended on 12 Feb 44 so the start date given by your source (15 Feb 44) looks right. There are multiple sources for Rance’s pivotal leadership of No. 52 TBR Wing from late February (when preparations for the attack on Tirpitz, Operation Tungsten, were under way, through April (Op. Tunsten, Op. Ridge Able) and into June 44 (Operation Lombard: https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/205155869). Turnbullmike (talk) 18:27, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mike, thanks, yes enjoyed looking into the FAA Wings as didn't realise they had wings beforehand. Thanks for your detailed information. I have double checked my reference source to ensure I had copied correctly versus it. Happy for you to change based on your findings, and reading through I agree, it follows logically. Looking closer at my source, it had Fox down as commencing on 24.3.44, so it could easily be a typo and they could've meant 24.1.44. Kind regards, Mike. Mikeyp72 (talk) 19:03, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Change made. Turnbullmike (talk) 14:51, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mikeyp72!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mikeyp72. Thank you for your work on Wildcat Maritime Force. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]