J u m p t o c o n t e n t
M a i n m e n u
M a i n m e n u
N a v i g a t i o n
● M a i n p a g e
● C o n t e n t s
● C u r r e n t e v e n t s
● R a n d o m a r t i c l e
● A b o u t W i k i p e d i a
● C o n t a c t u s
● D o n a t e
C o n t r i b u t e
● H e l p
● L e a r n t o e d i t
● C o m m u n i t y p o r t a l
● R e c e n t c h a n g e s
● U p l o a d f i l e
S e a r c h
Search
A p p e a r a n c e
● C r e a t e a c c o u n t
● L o g i n
P e r s o n a l t o o l s
● C r e a t e a c c o u n t
● L o g i n
P a g e s f o r l o g g e d o u t e d i t o r s l e a r n m o r e
● C o n t r i b u t i o n s
● T a l k
( T o p )
1
D e l e t i o n r e v i e w f o r O g g C o n v e r t
2
D u t c h w h e e l c h a i r t e n n i s p l a y e r s
3
P r e c i o u s a n n i v e r s a r y
T o g g l e t h e t a b l e o f c o n t e n t s
U s e r t a l k : M u Z e m i k e
A d d l a n g u a g e s
P a g e c o n t e n t s n o t s u p p o r t e d i n o t h e r l a n g u a g e s .
● U s e r p a g e
● T a l k
E n g l i s h
● R e a d
● E d i t
● A d d t o p i c
● V i e w h i s t o r y
T o o l s
T o o l s
A c t i o n s
● R e a d
● E d i t
● A d d t o p i c
● V i e w h i s t o r y
G e n e r a l
● W h a t l i n k s h e r e
● R e l a t e d c h a n g e s
● U s e r c o n t r i b u t i o n s
● U s e r l o g s
● V i e w u s e r g r o u p s
● U p l o a d f i l e
● S p e c i a l p a g e s
● P e r m a n e n t l i n k
● P a g e i n f o r m a t i o n
● G e t s h o r t e n e d U R L
● D o w n l o a d Q R c o d e
P r i n t / e x p o r t
● D o w n l o a d a s P D F
● P r i n t a b l e v e r s i o n
A p p e a r a n c e
F r o m W i k i p e d i a , t h e f r e e e n c y c l o p e d i a
Archives as of the dates listed (250KB or more to load; threads more than 3 days to be archived by bot or earlier upon personal discretion; displayed in order of date of last thread):
2009-04-29 · 2009-10-17 · 2010-01-09 · 2010-04-27 · 2010-08-12 · 2010-11-21 · 2010-03-10 · 2011-08-07 · 2012-01-28 · 2012-09-17 · present
An editor has asked for a deletion review of OggConvert . Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Daemonfc (talk ) 04:33, 31 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ]
Hello there! So I noticed you deleted Category:Dutch wheelchair tennis players in 2011. Since then, of course, things have changed quite a bit and articles on this subject have grown as wheelchair tennis has. I wanted to ask you if I am allowed to recreated as part of Category:Wheelchair tennis players ? Omnis Scientia (talk ) 21:21, 25 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ]
Just for a heads up. I took it to deletion review who allowed me to recreate the category: see here Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2023_December_26#Category:Dutch_wheelchair_tennis_players . Omnis Scientia (talk ) 22:04, 26 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ]
Precious
--Gerda Arendt (talk ) 09:34, 5 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ]
R e t r i e v e d f r o m " https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MuZemike&oldid=1230221479 "
● T h i s p a g e w a s l a s t e d i t e d o n 2 1 J u n e 2 0 2 4 , a t 1 2 : 5 9 ( U T C ) .
● T e x t i s a v a i l a b l e u n d e r t h e C r e a t i v e C o m m o n s A t t r i b u t i o n - S h a r e A l i k e L i c e n s e 4 . 0 ;
a d d i t i o n a l t e r m s m a y a p p l y . B y u s i n g t h i s s i t e , y o u a g r e e t o t h e T e r m s o f U s e a n d P r i v a c y P o l i c y . W i k i p e d i a ® i s a r e g i s t e r e d t r a d e m a r k o f t h e W i k i m e d i a F o u n d a t i o n , I n c . , a n o n - p r o f i t o r g a n i z a t i o n .
● P r i v a c y p o l i c y
● A b o u t W i k i p e d i a
● D i s c l a i m e r s
● C o n t a c t W i k i p e d i a
● C o d e o f C o n d u c t
● D e v e l o p e r s
● S t a t i s t i c s
● C o o k i e s t a t e m e n t
● M o b i l e v i e w