Contents

User talk:Myanw

This user may have left Wikipedia. Myanw has not edited Wikipedia since 14 January 2010. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

• Archive1

Stop removing notable names from the March 7 page. Just because you don't know who they are doesn't mean they aren't considered notable figures in their respected fields. I am working on their own pages, so for the time being just leave them on the March 7th page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.110.209.34 (talk • contribs)

Please do not add yourself or people without Wikipedia articles to this list. No red links, please. Do not link multiple occurrences of the same year, just link the first occurrence. Do not trust "this year in history" websites for accurate date information. - Myanw 06:42, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did not edit anything, you must have made a mistake, I have not even seen that article. I haven't logged in for months so I suppose you saw an ip adress . Well i certainly did not do anything and I am the only one with access to this pc. (JailbirdT)

Hello could you delete Matthew Backhouse please, cheers!

Sorry, no can do, I'm not an admin. - Myanw 14:22, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You were faster than me on the Pele revert. I may have used an older edit than you. Thanks for the good work! (3-20-2006 6:42AM CST)

Thank you :-) I'll go check the article now, I think I saw a typo or two in your revision, I'll see what I can do about it! Good job! - Myanw 11:49, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great job with the user reverts! You got there just before me, keep up the good work! Crested Penguin 09:31, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the edits to userpage of User talk:Opelio were wrongly assigned to me, I am a strong anti-vandalism fighter (please see the edits made under my username). It has also been ages since I have edited not being logged in. The ip-adres I use is used by different people, maybe this is the reason why edits got "crossed" I strongly support anti-vandalism since it lowers standards and quality of wikipedia, it is also a loss of server capacity. Teardrop onthefire 11:35, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reversion. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 13:29, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. - Myanw 13:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting mine too :-) Will (aka Wimt) 11:03, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome ^^ - Myanw 11:04, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He vandalised Wikipedia again, after you gave him a last warning. Can you block him, please? A•N•N•Afoxlover hello! 17:34, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage. Gutworth 20:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Those vandals were very angry with you, it's the proof you're doing a great job! Nice smile by the way :-D - Myanw 20:57, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the page Earliest living United States president, Jimmy Carter was listed as the current earliest living president.

This conflicts with his date of birth being 4 months later than George H. W. Bush.

Jimmy Carter was born 1-OCT-1924 and George H. W. Bush was born 6-12-1924 according to Whitehouse.gov therefore it is Bush who is the current earliest living president.

If I have misunderstood, please advise.

As I understand it, the article lists the living president that served longest ago, I'm certainly not as familiar with former US President as any US citizen would be, but to me, Jimmy Carter served before George H. W. Bush. Since the former is still alive (isn't he?), I'd leave him where he was. Now, I understand your (valid) point regarding who's older, but IMHO it's not what the list is about. (By the way, I removed the warning since it was clearly not vandalism, I apologize for issuing it to you) Cheers - Myanw 09:01, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not bothered about whether that sentence is in or not.. I'm not sure that I even like it. I was just curious as to why it had been removed with an edit summary of "removing vandalism", that's all. aLii 12:12, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was The Weather Channel staff or meterologists that did this to the article.

--4.85.128.5 05:50, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, sorry. - Myanw 07:53, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Myanw, I was trying to restore the Art pgae, to a former version, you were doing it the same time (so I got the edit conflict :-) ), but can't we go to a newer version than Martinbot, which was your restoration point. The next edit was identified by the ISP but I think it is the newer version, which is not a vandal. Best wishes, --Cyril Thomas 15:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Mmm I checked the intermediate revisions and I think every one of them contains vandalism, if I missed anything, feel free to revert to whichever version you prefer, I've got no problem with it. Cheers and keep up the good work :-) - Myanw 15:15, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for restoring the interwiki links i accidently deleted on Alfonso Caycedo. not really sure how you got there that fast; i was about to put them back in myself when i saw they were already back.

interestingly (to me), this happened because i was nuking the entire external links section, which was the last section of the article. i clicked on the section edit link, nuked all text (too quickly, it turns out), previewed it, and saved it. didn't know until this moment that categories and interwiki links get appended to the last section of an article, and since i was only editing the section, the preview didn't clue me in that anything was wrong. now i know.

ttfn. --barneca (talk) 18:56, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Well, actually, I was there to remove the "thank you" thingy the IP left on the page but you were quicker than me, so I checked the rest of the article, in case someone forgot something, and noticed the accidental removal of the interwiki links. Don't worry about it, it happened to me too the first few times I removed spam (that's why I always check if they're still there when external links are removed). I guess we all learn something new every day :-). Happy editing! - Myanw 19:18, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Im sorry.. 80.114.20.12 11:25, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• • Herman van Harten is inderdaad een bekende dierenarts in Nederland.. Hij heeft onder andere de boeken "Mijn dier en ik" en "Schapen: hoe en wat" uitgebracht.

Met vriendelijke groet,

80.114.20.12 11:32, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• • • Omdat ik geen account heb kan ik geen artikel creeren, hoe erg ik dat ook vind.. 80.114.20.12 11:44, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my user page. Keep up the good work! :) TwoOars ^{(T | C)} 12:54, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're most welcome - Myanw 12:55, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

... for reverting my talk page. Apprecate it! :) I just blocked that vandal, BTW - Alison^☺ 13:58, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, silly vandals... - Myanw 14:00, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning. You just added 2 vandalism warnings here. May I ask what templates you used when tagging the page with the warnings? It appears that those templates need updating but I'm having trouble finding the source pages. Thanks. Rossami (talk) 14:30, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I use the old {{subst:test}} template, which comes by default with Twinkle. When I started RC patrol, someone gave me a link to the TestTemplates (now I see that it's deprecated), I believe you'll be able to find the source here [1]. Cheers! - Myanw 16:22, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm stumped. Template:Test does not insert the datestamped header that I saw in this edit. How do you apply those templates? Do you apply them by hand? Does the script apply them? If so, do you know which script?
I'm also concerned because in this example edit, the template inserted the hidden tag asserting that it came from Template:Test3 but the wording of the warning you added has the extra sentence about IP addresses, leading me to believe that this was a forked template but that the hidden tag didn't get updated.
Thanks. Rossami (talk) 18:59, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, I use Twinkle which regroups several scripts, I'm afraid I have no clue which one is responsible for the templates used to warn. But I guess you could ask a question on the project's talk page, I perused it quickly and it seems you're the first one to express this concern (but I could have missed something). I'm sorry if I'm not really helpful here, I don't know anything about JavaScript but I sure hope you'll find a solution, please keep me posted, I'd like to know if you succeeded. Keep up the good work! - Myanw 20:17, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the new scripts produce a much better result. I'm not sure how much value there is to the anon-IP sentence, though. The first time on the page can be helpful but it will just clutter it up if that gets added every time. I'll keep watch to see how much that happens. Thanks for figuring out that it was the update. I'll pass the word on to others. Have a good evening. Rossami (talk) 01:51, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting vandalism in my user page. --Meno25 20:24, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, indeed :-) - Myanw 22:56, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your anonymous vandal has been blocked for 1 day. Feel free to let me know if they return. -- Longhair\^talk 11:02, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beg harder. --84.68.75.191 17:48, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the catch on my user page, surprised I hadn't already noticed it! --Samtheboy ^(t/c) 11:58, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, it wasn't obvious, I had to check twice before reverting. Cheers. - Myanw 12:00, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

first you'll need to tell the peninsula students to get over themselves —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kimmim (talk • contribs).

Cheers for the revert on my userpage, not sure why they targetted me, I've never had anything to do with them. Thanks again Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/talk 14:36, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome - Myanw 20:55, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage, don't you just wish some people on here would grow up!!! Thatguy69 11:01, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, silly vandals tsssss. You're welcome :-) - Myanw 11:02, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I try to be quick! =) --† Ðysepsion † ^{Speak your mind} 21:52, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the double db tag; we must have done it at that same time. Thanks for catching it so quickly! Jmlk17 09:58, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert my edit on the Rugrats Charaters page? I wasn't vandelizing the page, I was correcting it. Drew and Charlotte are married. Those quotation marks shouldn't belong there. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.121.21.37 (talk • contribs).

Hello, please see this diff. You deleted nearly everything in the adults' section, it might have been accidental, but the removal of such a large portion of the text, with a misleading edit summary such as the one you gave, rang a bell in my head. I assumed good faith and told you that you had removed something which, IMHO, should stay. Feel free to change whatever you tried to change, but, please, try not to accidently delete anything in the process. - Myanw 12:58, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, that was accidental. I apologise for not noticing.

I was sort of hoping the user could take a hint without it coming to that. Although I guess that's not likely to happen, per the comment he left on my user page. - Bobet 10:53, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I've seen you around a lot cleaning up a lot of vandalism (in fact, usually beating me to it! Grrr. :P) Some very impressive vandal hunting! You deserve this. RazorICE 11:35, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! *tips hat* Now stop beating me to the vandals! :P --RazorICE 11:43, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's you again! I keep seeing you all over the place, you're doing some mighty fine vandal hunting! I'd give you another barnstar, but... you know, one's enough. :P --RazorICE 13:49, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea but someone is using my ip address. I have made no corrections since january and only then i used my username. I have never even touched a userpage. i have no idea whos doing this —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.183.136.16 (talk • contribs).

He is a pkk militiant.Open kürdistan portal I'm from turk.This not leave --88.241.95.29 13:25, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

a Ip-adress can't quit vandalising my page! gaet him banned, please!-)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 08:00, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Was my vandalism original? 202.156.66.110 16:42, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was sure that adding a "You have new messages (last change)" banner to the top of a couple of pages would be something that no one had ever done before, and might go unnoticed until someone (likely the first person to view the page) tried to click on it and realised it was vandalism and reverted it. Oh well, back to the drawing board. 202.156.66.110 14:55, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That would get old, fast. 202.156.66.110 17:11, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why get rid of userboxes? 202.156.66.110 03:14, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All the content is now moved fron Heinrich Engelhard Steinweg and Henry Steinway to Henry E. Steinway ( Including the discussion). So its got nothing to do with vandalism. greetings KarlKunde 11:08, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thanks very much for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. It is much appreciated. Keep up the good work! :-) Lradrama 12:02, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How did you manage to revert the vandalism on John Cage? because every time I tried to revert it the spam protection filter wouldn't let me process the edit? did you find and remove the link? The sunder king 10:55, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

it is not unconstructive. you know nothing about our football team. dont get involved. Nothing written has been offensive —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamgk1 (talk • contribs) 11:58, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi mate, is there any reason why you removed the Samboraly Yours link off of the Richie Sambora Wiki page? Cheers —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulkinm (talk • contribs) 12:44, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. I thought he might come back.Recurring dreams 12:30, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! - Myanw 12:32, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help!--Mike Searson 14:21, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! - Myanw 14:32, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm rather dumbfounded by this one. I have a notification on my talk page that adapt is going to be deleted (which it was just afterward), but as far as I know I never even contributed to the article. The only guess I have is that, other than being a random mistake by the notification bot, I could've contributed to an earlier version of the article, before the change to whatever content got it deleted. Could you please explain what happened?  –radiojon 02:07, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

• Thanks for your response, I think that must be exactly what it is. Is it possible for you to only undelete the good edit, and keep the subsequent edits deleted?  –radiojon 06:56, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Radiojon created the page originally (back in 2004!) and was notified as the original creator, rather than the editor who should have been notified who'd applied later changes. My bad (I'm not using an automated tool; as an admin I can look at deleted revisions but didn't look in enough detail) and, I suppose, the automated thingy that Myanw's using should have a bit more sense as well. Apologies for the confusion caused. (this message copied to Radiojon and Myanw) Tonywalton  | Talk 08:15, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Myanw! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 868 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Hemlata Kala - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 16:11, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]