 | This user may have left Wikipedia. NiciVampireHeart has not edited Wikipedia since 7 June 2020. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Hi, how are you? Sorry to bother you about it.
There is a graffiti in Sunderland with Raich Carter, here's a link: [1].
I don't know how to do it, so could I please ask you to upload that photo to Wiki? I would like to add it to theCity of Sunderland, Hendon, Sunderland, Raich Carter and Sunderland AFC articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxim.il89 (talk • contribs) 15:47, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
no— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pennegod (talk • contribs) 18:54, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Message added 15:09, 26 September 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Please see the comment I made about the user’s edit request. IanDBeacon (talk) 15:09, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, can you tell me if you are currently acting as admin for this article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Godwhale (talk • contribs)
Thanks for the reply and link. I’m familiar with how WP works, its just that I note that recently the article has been subject to ‘semi-protected edit requests,’ most recently on 11th March this year. I have added some text in the discussion page, as I have previously. I would greatly appreciate your thoughts on the points I have made. --Godwhale (talk) 08:45, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
One of the major complaints made about WP is that it doesn’t enforce its own rules, allowing militant editors to bully newcomers and make others give up trying to achieve balanced articles because they know it is pointless. This is what has happened here; for years numerous editors have complained about Rjensen, a former major contributor to Conservapedia who uses sock-puppets to back up his arguments and wear people down by sheer bloody-minded attrition. Yet nothing is ever done to control his behavior and he is left alone to work with other militant editors to turn previously balanced articles into nationalistic BS. This article was far better ten years ago and as before, the points I have made on the talk page will be ignored because they know perfectly well they have no defence. I don't really understand why you would bother to become an admin and then not want to even try to deal with this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:1888:300:E599:B6A:B450:874D (talk) 07:32, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I just wanted to say. 125.212.220.48 (talk) 18:00, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
= 125.212.220.48 (talk) 20:00, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello NiciVampireHeart, Thank you for responding so quickly to my attempt to add 4 four school shootings to the List of school shootings in the United States. I made the changes you suggested and titled the subject "Change === 2000s === to include four more school shootings & sources." I would greatly appreciate your expertise with Wikipedia if you could take a look in order to make sure I formatted it correctly this time.
Here is the direct link to the talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_school_shootings_in_the_United_States
Sincerely, NabuThoth — Preceding unsigned comment added by NabuThoth (talk • contribs) 12:45, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the clarification, I also made a requested on the page you indicated. Zerbey (talk) 18:29, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
In case you wish to comment... Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Taemak. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 06:12, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hey sweetie. Just a little reminder that I inserted your name into the Missing Wikipedians list after over a whopping 96000+ contributions here. Please delete yourself from the aforementioned listing if you ever come back.
Best wishes,
69.126.32.189 (talk) 20:15, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
What is tha disaster movement — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4043:19d:d718:881c:13b1:73bc:36a4 (talk • contribs)
Hi there,
My apologies in regards to not providing sources for the suggested amend to the Sir Ernest Shackleton article - I have responded on the talk page with articles to support now. Could you please advise if these are sufficient? Many thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ljmacdonald92 (talk • contribs)
Thank you - also thank you for the welcome message and guidance. Much appreciated. Ljmacdonald92 (talk) 13:22, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello NiciVampireHeart! I'm sorry to disturb you. Sorry for my English. Please help me defend the honor of martial artist Bruce Lee. The page dedicated to Bruce Lee was corrected by unscrupulous personalities and they removed the line “martial artist” in it. I tried to just fix it. But my corrections were quickly removed and said that Bruce Lee is not a master. With mockery, they asked me to personally prove to them that Bruce Lee is a master. And I began to prove it in the discussion. To prove something that does not need evidence for a long time ago. I spent 5 sleepless nights to find reputable sources and, moreover, the opinions of real experts on Bruce Lee's account. I have provided a million arguments. You yourself can see them. But they still don’t want to understand me. I am writing to you from Russia, all this happens on the Russian Wikipedia branch, on the Russian page dedicated to Bruce Lee. She is not protected in any way. And none of the Russian participants comes to my aid. At the moment, they refuse to fully recognize him as martial artists. I ask them to acknowledge the fact of the world and write it in the preamble without any unnecessary comments that they personally added now, they belittle it as a master. I want everything to be like the English version of Bruce Lee's Wikipedia page. Everything is well written there. Please, help. AfighterN (talk) 21:42, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
| Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive |  |
July 2021 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.
Click here to opt out of any future messages. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Shawn Michaels, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. --Whiteguru (talk) 12:29, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The file File:Jared Leto in Dublin 2008.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused, poor quality image, no foreseeable encyclopedic use.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:54, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
| Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive | |
January 2022 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.
Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. | |
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]
| Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. | |
Matt Hardy has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:47, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
An article that been involved with (The Usos) has content that is proposed to be removed and moved to another article (Jey Uso). If you are interested, please visit the discussion. Thank you. Summerslam2022 (talk) 22:52, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dolph Ziggler has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 00:34, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Beth Phoenix has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:46, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hardcore Holly has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (chat!) 06:28, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
