Would you be so kind to tag specific sections or sentences that are dubious in some way? before removing the tag I read the entire article and made sure that I didn’t see anything suspicious. Of course you might know more about the topic than I do and you might find some things that warrant tagging. JehochmanTalk
I have made several attempts to make "Contributions" to Wikipedia only to have them "reverted" by you. If there is a simple way to get my latest contribution recast, I would like to do that. I believe that this contribution is a significant addition to the page and Wikipedia. I offer it if it fits yours and Wikipedia's standards. Please advise me of your requirements.
12:47, 4 November 2023 diff hist +627 Transcendental Model 1-G No edit summary Tag: Reverted
@Nigel Ish you created this page and I was wondering if you have contacts, that could possibly have access to Building plans of this plane. I need them to figure out a way of fitting a different engine. Thanks and cheers 24.206.107.71 (talk) 10:33, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Nigel Ish, I was wonder if I could keep my other sources and remove Aviastar, since I believe the rest of the Kamov Ka-15 article was fine. Forevernewyes (talk) 18:52, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please add one of those templates that state that a article lacks citations? I dont know how to use those. Thank you, don't mean to bug you. Forevernewyes (talk) 19:00, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for adding what I wanted to be in the article but with reliable sources, I was upset the Ka-15 didn't have much of a Wikipedia article, close to a stub almost. Forevernewyes (talk) 21:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can understand removing Aviastar due to copyvio (which sucks since that site is often one of the few in English but it is what it is), but what's wrong with flugzeuginfo.net? Is it on a list of unreliable resources? Tengu99 (talk) 16:10, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The references for the Aero A.304 were taken directly from the Czech wiki page, as was the rest of the translation. No "fake" references were used that I know of. If they are fakes, then the Czech page is fake also. I've you have an issue with the references or the translation you can either state that on the talk page or correct them yourself. I'm reverting your deletion and ask that you kindly communicate your concerns in a more proper manner. Tengu99 (talk) 03:24, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]