Contents

User talk:Ntmr

Adventure

HiNtmr!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there! Play The Wikipedia Adventure This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 21:49, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for pointing out the listing error. I've adjusted the positioning of the cites to make it clear what is actually citing what. I personally don't particularly like that style of citation (cite-per-sentence rather than cite-per-paragraph) because I think it looks ugly, but better that than causing confusion. I hope that answers your issues. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 09:34, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, I don't think your theory on upgrade to II* after refurbishment can be quite right, as the English Heritage listing that you cite containing the II* also says that Foxhill House is 'now Student Hall of Residence'. It hasn't been that for a good 10 years, and the refurbishment was after it ceased to be student accommodation. So unless EH have been very sloppy, it was II* before the refurbishment. My guess would be that the University Press Officer who wrote the Bulletin articles didn't understand the significance of that *. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 09:41, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Earley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reading. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edittoEarley may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * 25 Church Road – 1820s cottage red and grey chequered brick;);<ref>{{cite web | url = http://list.english-heritage.org.uk/resultsingle.aspx?uid=1303525| title =

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:42, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to St John the Evangelist's Church, Chichester, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 17:36, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I find you discourteous and you are being defiant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Berksenterprisegeek (talk • contribs) 17:21, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Southampton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry VI. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gwlad - The Welsh Independence Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

doktorb _words^deeds 09:40, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited South Wales Central (Senedd Cymru electoral region), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Labour and Joel James.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Court of quarter sessions, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Abingdon, Andover and Deal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ntmr,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username TheWikiholic, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged People born in Eastleigh for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheWikiholic}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TheWikiholic (talk) 08:49, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TheWikiholic: please delete as soon as possible. I had just added Heather Hallett’s birthplace to her Wikipedia page and I was trying to set up a “ categories: list of people born in Eastleigh” which does not appear to exist yet.Ntmr (talk) 14:26, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pontypridd (UK Parliament constituency), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberal Democrats.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:03, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ntmr, you added Andrew John to the notable former pupils list of Ysgol Penglais School. You provided a citation that did not confirm that he had attended the school. His biography article says that he did but it is not sourced. I've left your edit in place and added a citation needed tag. Gab4gab (talk) 13:37, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Just a quick courtesy note to say I've reverted a few of your mentions that the Bishop of Llandaff has retired. Yes, she had her final service, but her resignation of the See isn't in effect 'til New Year: "Vacancy in the See of Llandaff". Church Times. No. 8334. 9 December 2022. p. 25. ISSN 0009-658X. DBD 20:28, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing that out - the Llandaff press release is misleading! Ntmr (talk) 23:44, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

now we see importance of words of clarity 148.252.133.43 (talk) 08:00, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Poles in the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cardiff West.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. Please note Wikipedia policy on not editing one own page. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Autobiography

Tschüß 148.252.132.143 (talk) 11:09, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your recent edit to Pontypridd appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:10, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Senghenydd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abertridwr.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]