Contents

User talk:Olegna92

Hello and welcometoWikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• Noedit warringorabuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandboxtodo so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertisingorpromotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Doug Weller talk 08:29, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Robert M. Schoch has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 08:30, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Travis Walton UFO incident. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Cannolis (talk) 05:25, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at The Sign and the Seal, you may be blocked from editing. Hypnôs (talk) 09:38, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The only incorrect information deliberately introduced is the information on your page. I'm only correcting the "information" you've had on the page. Olegna92 (talk) 09:58, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 10:10, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I considered a full block but perhaps you can learn to edit according to our policies and guidelines. Note that we are a mainstream encyclopedia and a good start for that is User:Roxy the dog#All your bias are belong to us. (Yes. We are biased, version 2.0). You can't just change sourced information because you don't like it, see WP:VERIFY. You are editing fringe material and we have a noticeboard where you can discuss fringe material at WP:FTN. If you can't live with our being a mainstream encyclopedia you probably should be editing somewhere else. Doug Weller talk 10:16, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I guess Wikipedia isn't a reliable source of information if you're perfectly fine destroying the reputation, dignity, and character of people. Maybe you just can't live with someone fixing your biased point of view mistakes. Olegna92 (talk) 19:13, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your problem, not mine. Apparently you don’t think you have a case to appeal my block. Frankly your edit asserting as fact that there have been alien abductions was the weirdest. Although claiming Graham Hancock, who denies being an archaeologist, wrote an archaeological book came close and showed that you aren’t actually familiar with what Hancock has said about that issue. And of course your edit to Schoch’s article was clearly out a typo. That sort of edit summary misrepresenting your edit makes it seem you hope people won’t read your edit. And it misrepresented the source which isn’t exactly honest. Or do you not understand that sourced text should reflect the source? Doug Weller talk 19:31, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]