Hello, I'm NottNott. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~NottNott ( ✉ -☻) 14:30, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Enstatite, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Jacona (talk) 14:31, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hilary Jenkinson has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:36, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hunasamaranahalli, you may be blocked from editing. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 14:47, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Paddy Crean. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 14:54, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Kieran Parry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nominationbyvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KH-1 (talk) 15:09, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/OverlordDibbles, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Bazj (talk) 15:20, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Monty845 16:44, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
