Contents

User talk:Owenglyndur

Hello, Owenglyndur!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 〜 Adflatuss • talk 13:34, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks man Owenglyndur (talk) 15:26, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Please learn correct citation style. We don't put links directly from the text to the outside. Wikipedia:Citing sources is a place to start, but also you can check how other editors do it. Even when you move the links to the correct place, you should give more than a raw url as they always disappear eventually. Give an author, if possible, title, name of publication, date, so that dead links can be refreshed later. Incidentally, INN is not considered a reliable source for information about settlements so you should replace it. I will leave what you wrote at Migdal Oz for now to give you the chance to fix it, but fixing it is essential. Zero^talk 00:21, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you marked your edits as "minor" but they are not. See Help:minor edits. Zero^talk 00:22, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you very much for your comments i fund them very helpful Owenglyndur (talk) 09:56, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are still marking edits as minor when they are not minor. Please stop. Zero^talk 13:14, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thank you for noticing, it is a great help Owenglyndur (talk) 13:50, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I saw you amended some of the text, and sourced it to the village website. However, the village website says that its text is sourced from Wikipedia, so it cannot be used as a reference. The Hebrew wiki article is very well referenced, so I would advise translating from there instead. Cheers, Number 57 22:26, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't know if you missed this comment? Number 57 10:42, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HI, your comment was very helpfull and i added more refferences as you advised, if you can help more to enrich the article please do so. Owenglyndur (talk) 11:18, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies if I wasn't clear initially – I wasn't asking for more sources, I was suggesting a complete rewrite of the early history section, basing it on translating the Hebrew Wikipedia's history of the village and using those sources. I have now deleted the bit sourced from a source that used Wikipedia as its source. Number 57 21:12, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Burial Stone. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 07:53, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Owenglyndur. Thank you for your work on Ein Nashut. Boleyn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please add inline citations

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Boleyn (talk) 14:36, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Thanks for your review of the article about Ein Nasshut, I have added citations as you suggesdted. If you have relevant information to add i'd be glad to read it. Owenglyndur (talk) 15:34, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Hirbet Danila. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:06, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Josh,

How are you?

Thanks for moving it to draftspace, something came up and i couldn't finish editting the article. Owenglyndur (talk) 06:42, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hirbet Danila and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hello, Owenglyndur! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:36, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am working on it, please let me finish Owenglyndur (talk) 07:41, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you're translating articles from he.wiki, which is great. Most of them are probably okay, but just bear in mind that articles need to pass our (en.wiki) requirements for referencing, notability, etc. In other words, merely existing in another language version of Wikipedia is not enough to justify inclusion in another version, as each version is an entirely separate project with their own rules and requirements (and, AFAIK at least, en.wiki is probably the strictest in that sense). Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:43, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok,

Thank you very much Owenglyndur (talk) 10:10, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Hovlata. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it's a text dump of a Google translation of a Hebrew Wikipedia article. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 08:38, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I moved "Roman roads in Judaea/Palaestina" to Roman roads in Judaea and created a redirect from "Roman roads in Palaestina". The article looks like it is mainly about Judaea and that tile is concise and easier for the reader. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 12:33, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help, most appreciated Owenglyndur (talk) 13:23, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the Second Temple article, you reverted the dispute without it being resolved. You're welcome to discuss the dispute. Omar Jabarin (talk) 14:34, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Roman roads in Judaea at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Z1720 (talk) 13:59, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thank you for your comments, i tried to clarify all issues, i hope the article looks better now. Owenglyndur (talk) 07:48, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Horvat Burgin

added links pointing to British Mandate, Shlomtzion, Guerin, Beit Guvrin, Georgian inscriptions and Fifth Legion

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:59, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Owenglyndur, thank you for taking the time to work on the article about Roman roads in Judaea. It's an interesting topic which should be covered in Wikipedia. I have documented some issues with the sourcing on the talk page, would you be able to address them? Richard Nevell (talk) 19:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Owenglyndur, please note that these issues will keep your DYK nomination from being approved. I hope you're able to address them soon! BlueMoonset (talk) 03:42, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Owenglyndur! Your additions to Ein Gedi synagogue have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensedorpublic domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's elegibility.
• Copyrighted material donation:Ifyou hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Richard Nevell (talk) 19:37, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Owenglyndur, the same issue is evident in your newly created article, Ein Gedi (archaeological site). In your edit summary you indicated that the article has been translated from the Hebrew Wikipedia; is there perhaps a problem with the Hebrew Wikipedia entries on these two topics? Richard Nevell (talk) 19:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments, I did my best in the translation and editing so there will not be any copy violations. Please can you let me know where? how? can you see copy issues? Owenglyndur (talk) 07:34, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Using Google Translate to check the Hebrew version of the entry for Ein Gedi archaeological site, the two paragraphs of text identified as being a copyright violation are not present; they were added before the text currently at the start of the 'היסטוריה' section.

With the article on the Ein Gedi synagogue, the situation seems to be the same with the copyrighted text introduced before the text at the start of the section titled 'ממצאי החפירות'. It also appears that your edit to the Hebrew article introduced a copyright violation.

Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policy regarding copyright violations? Wikipedia:Copyright violations.

It looks like content has been copied from journal articles and pasted into Wikipedia with minimal changes. Unless the text is already available under a Wikipedia compatible open licence, this is a breach of copyright. Richard Nevell (talk) 19:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your first comment, your complain is about a text that isn't there anymore? did i understand you correctly?

Regarding your second comment i revised the text, i hope it is suitable now Owenglyndur (talk) 12:06, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is that though your edit summary when creating the article on Ein Gedi (archaeological site) indicated you translated the article from Hebrew, you introduced copyrighted text from another source. This has since been removed, as has some copyrighted text at Ein Gedi synagogue, but there may be other instances, especially as I have also discovered issues with Khirbet el-Qutt.

The part of the synagogue article that you reworded in this edit does not appear to have been copied from the source, so was not problematic for that reason.

You've created dozens of articles in just a couple of months. May I suggest that you change focus to checking over the content you have created to make sure that it isn't breaching Wikipedia's policy on copyright violations? If it has happened it is something that can be fixed, but if we don't address it now I am concerned that it will get out of hand. There are training materials like this module which explain copyright and how to avoid plagiarism and close paraphrasing. Richard Nevell (talk) 18:11, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is now evidently some level of copyright violation in Deir ed Darb‎. If I find more evidence of copyright violations, I will look into opening an investigation. Richard Nevell (talk) 22:26, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Owenglyndur. Thank you for your work on Ein Gedi archaeological site. Another editor, Joseywales1961, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for the article - I was nearby to that site when I visited Israel in the 1980's and 90's

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Josey Wales ^Parley 20:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, so cool to read you comment, you are welcome to visit it again Owenglyndur (talk) 07:31, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kiryat Arbaya, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• Abare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:18, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kiryat Arbaya, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• Abare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:18, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is to inform you that I have begun the review process of your DYK, in the article Khirbet el-Qutt. Please address the issues raised in my review.Davidbena (talk) 01:30, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review and comments. Owenglyndur (talk) 06:06, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AtTalk:Palestinians, you have been given the opportunity to respond to your slow edit warring without supplying appropriate sourcing in support of your personal opinions. This is disruptive POV pushing. I suggest you reconsider your approach or we will be debating this in another place. Selfstudier (talk) 14:44, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Khirbet Kelafa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nominationbyvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Richard Nevell (talk) 18:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Khirbet el-Ein requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nominationbyvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Richard Nevell (talk) 20:32, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Owenglyndur. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. Thank you. Richard Nevell (talk) 23:27, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Khirbet el-Qutt at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 04:01, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Richard Nevell (talk) 11:36, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Star Mississippi 13:12, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is being done to protect the project and is not meant to be forever - simply until you're able to show an understanding of why en wiki cannot be a host to copyright violations. Star Mississippi 13:13, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I understand the part about copywrite text and i will take time to learn about it, so i can write better articles in the future. Regarding images, each and every image i uploaded to wikipedia was mine and only mine taken over years of travelling in Israel. Now i finally have the time to sit and write about the places i've been and the things i've seen. Owenglyndur (talk) 14:35, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure you understand the goal of Wikipedia, but you're welcome to file an unblock and an administrator will review it. All articles need to be based on independent, reliable sources. Not what you've seen and done. Star Mississippi 15:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Just to be clear, all the articles i wrote were based on independent, reliable sources, all academic sources.

The pictures i uploaded to wikicommons/wikipedia are mine. Owenglyndur (talk) 15:28, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you're welcome to file an unblock and it will be reviewed. Star Mississippi 15:44, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Owenglyndur (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I am requesting to be unblocked, I understand the mistakes I have made violating copyright policy. I took the last few days to better learn and understand Wikipedia's copyright policy. I created some articles in Hebrew reaching 0.0% at the Copyvio Detector and I am sure I can do the same in English, never violating Wikipedia's policy again.Owenglyndur (talk) 07:49, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We need you to demonstrate your understanding, not just tell us that you understand. Please tell us how your prior edits were copyright violations, what copyright is, and how to properly use copyrighted content on Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 08:13, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

331dot - I understand that in articles I have written before I used texts copied from the sources I provided, which violates Wikipedia's policy. The text I copied and presented in the article was published on Wikipedia without the permission of the copyright holder. Furthermore, I translated some texts word for word, which also violates Wikipedia's policy. I know that even using texts that were very slightly changed or altered, violates Wikipedia's policy. The same goes for texts that remain close, similar or might be linguistically resembling the source or sources on which I based the article also violates Wikipedia's policy. I know that all the text I write and text I translate from any source, must be done using my own words. As I pointed out in my request to remove the block, articles I created lately, have zero percentage of copyright violation. Owenglyndur (talk) 12:37, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please make a new unblock request for someone else to review. 331dot (talk) 23:42, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Owenglyndur (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I am requesting to be unblocked for violating Wikipedia's copyright policy. I have spent the last few days learning how to follow Wikipedia's policy. I understand that in articles I have written before, I used texts copied from the sources I provided, which violates Wikipedia's policy. The text I copied and presented in the article was published on Wikipedia without the permission of the copyright holder. Furthermore, I translated some texts word for word, which also violates Wikipedia's policy. I know that even using texts that were very slightly changed or altered, violates Wikipedia's policy. The same goes for texts that remain close, similar or might be linguistically resembling the source or sources on which I based the article also violates Wikipedia's policy. I know that all the texts I write and texts I translate from any source, must be done using my own words. I have created some articles in Hebrew and used the Copyvio Detector and I am glad to say all articles came out with a result of 0.0%. I am sure I can do the same in English.Owenglyndur (talk) 07:46, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hi, I am requesting to be unblocked for violating Wikipedia's copyright policy. I have spent the last few days learning how to follow Wikipedia's policy. I understand that in articles I have written before, I used texts copied from the sources I provided, which violates Wikipedia's policy. The text I copied and presented in the article was published on Wikipedia without the permission of the copyright holder. Furthermore, I translated some texts word for word, which also violates Wikipedia's policy. I know that even using texts that were very slightly changed or altered, violates Wikipedia's policy. The same goes for texts that remain close, similar or might be linguistically resembling the source or sources on which I based the article also violates Wikipedia's policy. I know that all the texts I write and texts I translate from any source, must be done using my own words. I have created some articles in Hebrew and used the Copyvio Detector and I am glad to say all articles came out with a result of 0.0%. I am sure I can do the same in English.[[User:Owenglyndur|Owenglyndur]] ([[User talk:Owenglyndur#top|talk]]) 07:46, 11 July 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hi, I am requesting to be unblocked for violating Wikipedia's copyright policy. I have spent the last few days learning how to follow Wikipedia's policy. I understand that in articles I have written before, I used texts copied from the sources I provided, which violates Wikipedia's policy. The text I copied and presented in the article was published on Wikipedia without the permission of the copyright holder. Furthermore, I translated some texts word for word, which also violates Wikipedia's policy. I know that even using texts that were very slightly changed or altered, violates Wikipedia's policy. The same goes for texts that remain close, similar or might be linguistically resembling the source or sources on which I based the article also violates Wikipedia's policy. I know that all the texts I write and texts I translate from any source, must be done using my own words. I have created some articles in Hebrew and used the Copyvio Detector and I am glad to say all articles came out with a result of 0.0%. I am sure I can do the same in English.[[User:Owenglyndur|Owenglyndur]] ([[User talk:Owenglyndur#top|talk]]) 07:46, 11 July 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hi, I am requesting to be unblocked for violating Wikipedia's copyright policy. I have spent the last few days learning how to follow Wikipedia's policy. I understand that in articles I have written before, I used texts copied from the sources I provided, which violates Wikipedia's policy. The text I copied and presented in the article was published on Wikipedia without the permission of the copyright holder. Furthermore, I translated some texts word for word, which also violates Wikipedia's policy. I know that even using texts that were very slightly changed or altered, violates Wikipedia's policy. The same goes for texts that remain close, similar or might be linguistically resembling the source or sources on which I based the article also violates Wikipedia's policy. I know that all the texts I write and texts I translate from any source, must be done using my own words. I have created some articles in Hebrew and used the Copyvio Detector and I am glad to say all articles came out with a result of 0.0%. I am sure I can do the same in English.[[User:Owenglyndur|Owenglyndur]] ([[User talk:Owenglyndur#top|talk]]) 07:46, 11 July 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

WP:EARWIG cannot detect close paraphrasing (WP:NOTEARWIG). My own experience of your work is that it is riddled top-to-bottom with close paraphrasing. That you are citing software that cannot detect your mistakes to argue that you have learned from them is not a good look. I would advise against unblocking this user until they have clearly demonstrated they know and respect the seriousness of close paraphrasing. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:40, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]