Contents

User talk:Pablov95

HiPablov95! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

HiPablov95! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How do I remove template messages?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First off, I'd like to thank you for improving plot summaries for our beloved readers. I would just like to remind you that Wikipedia cautions editors from using certain words that suggests bias, such as "fortunately", which you used in your edit of the The Karate Kid (2010 film). I have fixed that edit. Again, this is just a friendly reminder. Keep up the good work. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 10:18, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Nineteen Ninety-Four guy Oh, I wasn't sure of that. Thanks for the comment! Pablov95 (talk) 12:44, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, no prob. We only want the best for the encyclopedia. Say, would you like to shorten the plot summary of the Tom-Yum-Goong article? Your effort would be really appreciated. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 14:33, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Nineteen Ninety-Four guy Sure. Will check it out. Pablov95 (talk) 14:56, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that in multiple edit summaries you claimed that plot summaries must be 700 words or less. This is technically inaccurate, as WP:FILMPLOT is a guideline (albeit a widely accepted one) rather than a bright-line rule. Please do not say that they must be within 700 words. Rather, you can say "should", or other wording that allows for some flexibility (though I usually just say something like "trimmed per WP:FILMPLOT". Cheers! DonIago (talk) 05:54, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pablov95! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at X-Men (film)‎ that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 02:14, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Doniago Oh, sorry. Won't happen again. Thanks for the heads-up. Pablov95 (talk) 18:37, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! DonIago (talk) 18:51, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Good, the Bad and the Ugly has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. — CJDOS, Sheridan, OR (talk) 05:14, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Secret Garden (1993 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colin Bruce. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing cast names from film plot sections. There is not widespread agreement about thatm abd FILMPLOT is not mandatory, merely a guideline. The modus vivendi which has evolved is for older films to include the names in the plot section, while newer films do not. By removing them from the plot sections of older films, you are editing against the consensus of editors for those articles. Did you not stop to wonder why those articles included the names, or did you look at the articles' history's to see when they were added? Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:29, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the other comments on this page, please familiarize yourself with the use of guidelines on Wikipedia, and note that every MOS page says at the top quite clearly that they are not mandatory. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:30, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that MOS:FILMPLOT is a guideline hardly seems as though it should be considered license to merely ignore any portion of it that an individual editor might find 'inconvenient' in a given moment, and I disagree with your assertions that there is widespread disagreement about not including the cast names in the summary, or that there is any 'implicit consensus' for older films. FILMPLOT says nothing about making an allowance for older films.

In my experience, the reason why many articles include cast names in the plot section is merely because they are out of compliance and no editor has taken it upon themselves to resolve the problem.

If you or other editors personally disagree with that guidance, the place to discuss it is at the Talk page for the guideline, but it seems inappropriate to scold editors for adhering to a stated guideline. DonIago (talk) 01:02, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was wondering if you could trim the plot summary I've written for this article? It doesn't have to be within the 700-word limit though (considering WP:FILMPLOT is not a rigid rule) but maybe no more than 1000 words? I would really appreciate it. Thanks Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 10:25, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! Will take a look. Pablov95 (talk) 17:33, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good job for your edits. Do you think you could some shorten plot summaries on the 2018 Das Boot tv series article? It is quiet long. I do my own first. 92.17.198.220 (talk) 21:00, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I'll check it out later. Pablov95 (talk) 22:08, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you possibly try to make concision to the summaries more? User https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Auzandil is asking "any rule in Wikipedia restrict us with 200 words?" 92.17.198.220 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 20:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]