Contents

User talk:PancakeMistake

Archive 1, 2

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Susan Tolsky you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 19:21, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Susan Tolsky you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Susan Tolsky for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 20:20, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Susan Tolsky you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Susan Tolsky for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 16:41, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article On the Low you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:41, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article On the Low you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:On the Low for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:21, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article On the Low you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:On the Low for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:01, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Changed My Mind you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:21, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Changed My Mind you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Changed My Mind for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:41, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that you are semi-retired so do not check Wiki as much, but it has been nearly a month since your initial response to this review and no work has been done since... are you planning to implement the changes anytime soon? --K. Peake 07:19, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Changed My Mind you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Changed My Mind for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 21:21, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Vibe (Tove Styrke song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:02, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Vibe (Tove Styrke song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Vibe (Tove Styrke song) and Talk:Vibe (Tove Styrke song)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:21, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Vibe (Tove Styrke song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Vibe (Tove Styrke song) for comments about the article, and Talk:Vibe (Tove Styrke song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 20:21, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mistakes (Tove Styrke song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:03, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mistakes (Tove Styrke song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mistakes (Tove Styrke song) and Talk:Mistakes (Tove Styrke song)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 13:41, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mistakes (Tove Styrke song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mistakes (Tove Styrke song) for comments about the article, and Talk:Mistakes (Tove Styrke song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:21, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey buddy! It's me, Ryoga (aka the old "Novice") haha. I logged in today after a long time - probably 5 years (?) and man this website has changed a lot. I see names I don't recognize, new pages and the UI itself is so different. I came across the message that you had left me back in 2019 when I was going through my talk page's history. I'm so sorry I didn't reply sooner, I don't recall getting any email for your message. Had I received the mail I would have definitely logged in and replied.

Yeah, we used to talk a lot and we both were young. I was also 16 back then haha, to be honest I get second-hand embarrassment when I think about all the arguments and discussions I had gotten myself into back then. I am sure you remember a few of those :D But those were surely good times.

I hope life is treating you well, mine was pretty good till two years ago. My grandmother passed away which kinda left me broken and yeah since then it has not been the best car ride you can say :D I am now a struggling software engineer. What have you been up to? How's life been treating you? I hope this message reaches you!

Best, Ryoga (talk) 13:59, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for another late message! Didn't take almost four years though! I haven't logged in for quite some time. I realized just now I have some articles awaiting GA reviews. At random times I get an urge to improve an obscure article and nominate it. It's like me from 2011 is still here lol. I'm glad you logged in back in May! What made you decide to log in after 5 years? And how come you stopped editing altogether. Grew tired?

Haha, I try to avoid reading old messages because of all the cringe. Also try to avoid thinking about those subpar GAs I did in like 2011. I feel like the standards of GAs are better these days. I remember this whole squad of editors who did nothing but edit music articles for like Beyoncé and Madonna. And they would review each other's articles all the time.

I'm very sad to hear about your grandmother. I actually experienced the same thing, my paternal grandmother passed away two years ago as well. On an unrelated note, "paternal grandmother" sounds so weird. In Swedish we have separate words for maternal and paternal grandparents. And they're pretty funny if you're unfamiliar with them. Mormor and morfar (literally means mothermother and motherfather), and farmor and farfar (fathermother and fatherfather). Pretty self-explanatory.

Other than that life's pretty good. I have a bachelor's degree in communication science so that's going well. I hope life is treating you well, too! Pancake (talk) 18:41, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ryoga Godai Also I haven't got the hang of how to reply properly. Pancake (talk) 18:42, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again it took me almost a year to reply!!! I guess I log in whenever I feel like working on something and bring it up to a GA. But I end up not doing anything, anyway haha. I guess I've kind of lost the interest that I had years ago. And yeah, the reason I stopped is because I grew tired of farming for sources endlessly.

We did put in a lot of effort into those articles, and yes the editors we had back then lol.

Thanks for the kind words, it's almost 3 years now since grandmother's demise. And the words are pretty easy to remember haha. I also have unrelated news - a few of my friends are in Sweden now, they are doing their Master's degree (I forgot the university name though). They keep asking me to find a job in Sweden (which is not easy, of course), who knows life has in store.

I am glad to hear you're doing well. I do sometimes wish we had a platform where we could all just catch up sometime, atleast the people whom we used to work with on Wikipedia frequently. Take care! Ryoga (talk) 15:22, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sway (Tove Styrke song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grnrchst -- Grnrchst (talk) 13:24, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sway (Tove Styrke song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sway (Tove Styrke song) for comments about the article, and Talk:Sway (Tove Styrke song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grnrchst -- Grnrchst (talk) 11:41, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sway Tour you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grk1011 -- Grk1011 (talk) 19:03, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sway Tour you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sway Tour and Talk:Sway Tour/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grk1011 -- Grk1011 (talk) 20:21, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sway Tour you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sway Tour for comments about the article, and Talk:Sway Tour/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grk1011 -- Grk1011 (talk) 20:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mking-fnds-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mighty B cast.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stronger Than Jesus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 17:01, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Stronger Than Jesus you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Stronger Than Jesus and Talk:Stronger Than Jesus/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 01:00, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Stronger Than Jesus you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Stronger Than Jesus for comments about the article, and Talk:Stronger Than Jesus/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 14:22, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up hereorask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]