 | This user may have left Wikipedia. Pandora has not edited Wikipedia since 2010. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Hi Pandora! Looking forward to reading your texts! --Kurt
Hey sexy, what's news? BTW, if we're comparing edit lists and what they say about us, I think I need to report you to the FBI. Let's see, various deadly virii and warrior queens. Hmmm...
Hi. I just read your comment of mav's page. To append you username and the time to a message type 4 tilde(~) e.g. Mintguy 22:56 Jan 30, 2003 (UTC). type 3 tilde for just your name! Mintguy
Hi Pandora! I am ashamed to admit it, but I had never come across the spelling of Nzingha before, so when I checked for an existing article I didn't find the one you added. She has about thirty bilion differrent names, so I created an article under the title of Ann Nzinga Mbande and redirected all of the other spelling and names that I knew of at that time. I propose that we merge the two articles, I have already added the information from your artricle into mine as a starting point for the merge negotiations, and have not made any changes to your article. I think when the two are combined we may have an articel worthy of brilliant prose!Jay 09:39, 28 Jan 2004 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Pandora.glow.jpg-thumb 273 195.. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much, — Edwin Stearns | Talk 16:08, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Pandora.glow.jpg-thumb 273 195.. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much, — Edwin Stearns | Talk 16:09, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks for uploading the following image:
I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GNU Free Documentation License, {{PD-self}} if you wish to release your own work to the public domain, {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know at my talk page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much. Peter O. (Talk, automation script) 05:02, Dec 25, 2004 (UTC)
P.S. You can help tag other images at User:Yann/Untagged_Images. Thanks again.
Hi there! I'd like to invite you to explore Wikimedia Canada, and create a list of people interested in forming a local chapter for our nation. A local chapter will help promote and improve the organization, within our great nation. We'd also like to encourage everyone to suggest projects for our national chapter to participate in. Hope to see you there!--DarkEvil 15:04, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
By "received", it means that a Director's Edition of the game was released. This DVD contained the game and most of the bonus material, while the regular edition of the game was released on CD-ROMs. I hadn't noticed before, but that wording is indeed confusing. The comic book was a separate item that was packaged with the "Director's Edition".
Bullets interact with the game's particle effects. "Particle effects" is a computer graphics term that should probably have its own article, but doesn't. It's a bit tough to describe, so discussing it in the article would probably not be a good idea (featured article criterion 4: "It is of appropriate length, staying focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)."). Maybe internally linking "particle effects" to "visual effects" (where it is mentioned) would clear up the confusion. JimmyBlackwing 20:42, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
We need more Torontonians to help out with Torontopedia. If you are interested please visit the website. http://www.torontopedia.ca/ 23:54, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Greetings from the League of Copyeditors. Your name is listed on our members page, but we are unsure how many of the people listed there are still active contributors to the League's activities. If you are still interested in participating in the work of the League, please follow the instructions at the members page to add your name to the active members list. Once you have done that, you might want to familiarise yourself with the new requests system, which has replaced the old /proofreading subpage. As the old system is now deprecated, the main efforts of the League should be to clear the substantial backlog which still exists there. The League's services are in as high demand as ever, as evinced by the increasing backlog on our requests pages, both old and new. While FA and GA reviewers regularly praise the League's contributions to reviewed articles, we remain perennially understaffed. Fulfilling requests to polish the prose of Wikipedia's highest-profile articles is a way that editors can make a very noticeable difference to the appearance of the encyclopedia. On behalf of the League, if you do consider yourself to have left, I hope you will consider rejoining; if you consider yourself inactive, I hope you will consider returning to respond to just one request per week, or as many as you can manage. Merry Christmas and happy editing, The League of Copyeditors. |
Melon‑Bot (STOP!) 18:12, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
| WikiWomen Unite! | |
|---|---|
|
HiPandora! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:
We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can participate! |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
