Contents

User talk:Philwelch

This user may have left Wikipedia. Philwelch has not edited Wikipedia since October 2019. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Rhys Taylor

[edit]

As I saw it, Taylor had made no appearances in top league play and still didn't satisfy WP:ATHLETE. If I mis-read the article, though, I'll be happy to restore it (to its proper capitalization, no less). Please advise. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 22:08, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the first to acknowledge my ignorance of football, but my understanding is that Taylor hasn't made an appearance yet and he doesn't qualify for an article until he does. If you don't agree, please take up the matter at WP:DRV. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 22:25, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that he made the appearances, so I restored the article to Rhys Taylor. To avoid future nominations for CSD, please improve the article to mention Taylor's appearances. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 22:35, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note about the article's Talk page. It's been fixed. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 22:48, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I was just wondering why you asked "seriously?" on the Haitian embargo. Was there an official embargo on the country? Thanks. Cmguy777 (talk) 02:54, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the specific edit I made. It's far from incontrovertible fact that Th. Jefferson had enslaved "mulatto" children. Philwelch (talk) 03:01, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not/Outtakes, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not/Outtakes and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not/Outtakes during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. elektrikSHOOS^{(editing from a public terminal)} 14:29, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not/Outtakes, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not/Outtakes (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not/Outtakes during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. occono (talk) 22:34, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Calling shotgun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calling shotgun until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:31, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of new religious movements BigJim707 (talk) 11:37, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]