Saekki, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Konglish, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Work (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
Agungi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
There is no source in your editing. Are you discriminating against Japan? Racial discrimination violates the terms of Wikipedia. -CHR52 (talk) 09:25, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@CHR52: Well, Japanese academic societies aren't the only academia in the world. Also please note that common names are not necessarily the names used in academia. Plants and fruits are known by many names in various geographic areas. --Phonet (talk) 10:41, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
HaHaHa, "Well, Japanese academic societies aren't the only academia in the world. "? That is your subjectivity. You don't know the history Korea plagiarized from Japan.For example, Korean strawberries and Nori are all Japanese varieties. -CHR52 (talk) 10:50, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you have a belief, rewrite the Japanese version wikipedia. Do you have that much knowledge? If you can not do that, your claim is false. You are exactly the creator of "fake news". -CHR52 (talk) 11:03, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@CHR52: How is that my (or anyone's) subjectivity? What belief? Why would I edit Japanese Wikipedia? How can a country plagiarize history from another country? I have difficulties understanding your comments. I don't think you are expressing yourself clearly nor understanding what I'm saying. Please consider seeking help from Wikipedia:Embassy. If your native language is Japanese, the people listed in the section Wikipedia:Local Embassy#日本語 (ja) may help you better express what you want to say. --Phonet (talk) 11:50, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Phonet. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.