Contents

User talk:Phrasia

Press releases are not generally appropriate sources. Please see WP:RS. --Yamla (talk) 11:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Thank you. ☼Phrasia☼ (talk) 11:23, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The claim in the lede that "With many theories leading that the game demo (and the Vibri character) was not marketable and seen as intrusive and terrifying by game marketers" is not covered in the article, and isn't discussed in the source you added. Can you provide sources to verify this? Waxworker (talk) 11:59, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the Playstation blog that's what the publisher (and kinda more common knowledge reasons despite that other Nanaonsha franchises [Parappa and Jammer Lammy etc.] had American releases) is believing why Vibribbon was a Japan and Europe exclusive title, being that the game had an unnerving theme. But I understand and I figured my sources were justified, but if applicable I will try to find more valid ones that are suitable. I apologize. ☼Phrasia☼ (talk) 12:08, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The source doesn't say anything about having an 'unnerving theme', at most it calls it "quirky", nothing about being scary. This seems like WP:OR. Waxworker (talk) 12:19, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Hurl!, you may be blocked from editing. --Belbury (talk) 18:13, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Moving this thread here from my own talk page.)

Perhaps I was just in the templating mindset from that starting point of assuming that you were an inexperienced editor, before realising that you weren't, I don't really remember. The context isn't you making a mistake on a solitary article, though, it's a pattern of editing that you need to take seriously. Your current talk page is three different people telling you to use reliable sources, and in an unblock discussion a few weeks ago you acknowledged "past issues" with not sourcing your edits and said I assure you, that this will not be a problem anymore, and I am familiar with adding sources to my edits/contributions.

This is still a problem. --Belbury (talk) 10:02, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, as I said I'm not perfect, and I'm learning, and I will do better. Thank you. :) ☼Phrasia☼ (talk) 10:09, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TVtropes and Youtube are not reliable sources - see WP:RSPTVTROPES and WP:RSPYT. Please stop using WP:USERGENERATED sources. Waxworker (talk) 09:48, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which is why I added multiple sources, as with video games it's hard to get a consensus. The other sources are verified. ☼Phrasia☼ (talk) 09:50, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean when you say that ddrfreak.com "is a verified source"? It looks like a fansite, a WP:USERGENERATED source where users generate the content. Belbury (talk) 10:12, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then delete the entire article then. Why are you picking and choosing what to enforce, and then when I try to do it the proper way (get a consensus, AFD the article for being unsourced etc.) That's gonna take forever, and it's not what I want to do as I love DDR/Rhythm games.☼Phrasia☼ (talk) 10:15, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 10:33, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Music of Dance Dance Revolution until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Loyalmoonie (talk) 19:04, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]