Contents

User talk:Prunk/Archive 2

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Mateo & Matos

Hello! I just marked your new Mateo & Matos article as "page patrolled." I recognised you from the Nick Holder article, and I wanted to just say thanks for adding the new article to Wikipedia. Ecoleetage (talk) 13:16, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

I just added some WikiProject tags to the article, too. If there's anything else I can do to help you on this, just let me know. Ecoleetage (talk) 13:46, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Eddie Matos (actor), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Eddie Matos. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:36, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi! I see you have been contributing to the articles related to Slovenia. I invite you to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/Slovenia. --Eleassar ^{my talk} 08:21, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

When the pictures are all right-justified, this leaves big gaps in the article, which look as if something is broken. It is also unfortunate to have all the pictures hidden under the infobox. Judicious rearrangement of the text and pictures might be better than having them all stacked on the left. Ksnow (talk) 13:19, 25 July 2008 (UTC)Ksnow

Hello. I've done what I can with this. Multiple releases on major labels and having a track used in a film should see the article have no problems with notability, but the lack of sources that cover Shazz may be a problem. I couldn't find anything else to add.--Michig (talk) 20:12, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Do you have a picture about this food? or a reference with A GOOD PICTURE??

Warrington (talk) 22:32, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Unfortunatelly not. Prunk (talk) 10:15, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

This is somewhat misleading, when a search is done for a shell account and it pulls up the page "Shell Account" this is not a page just referring to "free shell accounts" it mentions personal, IRC, and bots most of which are NOT available on free accounts which seem to be listed in a abundance on this page. So my question is this. Why is a valid entry/shell provider that supports those items deleted from the external links? or rather why did you delete that link?

• Hi ! That listing is only suitable for historical shell providers, like Grex and a few others, which are allready listed, if you would like to enter a new shell provider, please enter it to the list provided outside Wikipedia (these lists are available at the bottom). Prunk (talk) 08:49, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Aproposed deletion template has been added to the article Tina Zajc, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unsourced one sentence "article" about a model who (apparently) won one competition/pageant and participated in another. Is mere participation in a Miss World pageant enough (if it's sourced in independent reliable sources) to meet the WP:BIO/WP:N notability bar?

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. B.Wind (talk) 17:57, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

There's quite a bit from this Google News search - that should give you enough to be going on with. There are also some Google Books sources, and a decent bio and several reviews ([1], [2], [3], [4]) at Allmusic. Should be plenty there.--Michig (talk) 11:30, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mount Lidgbird, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.about-australia.com/travel-guides/new-south-wales/lord-howe-island/attractions/natural/mount-lidgbird. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:00, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.