Contents

User talk:Psychonot

Please stop removing sourced materials from the articles. --Mhhossein ^talk 14:00, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Check the diff as well as my futher edits, I did not remove anything. Also further talk with you will be on Talk:Ali Khamenei.--Psychonot (talk) 18:27, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You need to check the diff once again. You had removed "Gareth Porter argues that ..." which was "nicely" sourced. --Mhhossein ^talk 19:30, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I already responded to this on Talk:Ali_Khamenei#Porter.27s_opinion--Psychonot (talk) 19:36, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As you know, the article is under WP:ARBPIA and it says that "If an edit is reverted by another editor, its original author may not restore it within 24 hours." In violation to this ruling, you (the original author) reverted my reverts and might be blocked after being reported. However, I can understand that you could've missed this sanction being applied to the article. So, are you going to revert your self and remove the materials as I did here and here, or do you want me to report your violation so that admins address your case? I think, we can settle it down without making any reports. --Mhhossein ^talk 19:37, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted only one edit and editor, not mine and not within 24 hours. However, you have engaged in persistent edit war with multiple editors at that article.--Psychonot (talk) 19:39, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's the last time I'm elaborating on this. Yes, you did 1. However, the applied sanction restricts restoring the materials written by you, even with just one revert. By the way, please show diff proving that I "have engaged in persistent edit war with multiple editors at that article." --Mhhossein ^talk 19:44, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The material in question was added several days ago,[1] obviously not with 24 hrs. Regarding your editwars, it's in the article's edit history. There's nothing to argue about that.--Psychonot (talk) 19:47, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your reverted me (and restored your material), less than 24 hrs after I had done the edit. So, let's see what the admins say. Regards. --Mhhossein ^talk 19:50, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! the material was actually in the article already from at least 2016 [2] (under fatwa), you removed it first.

• I have reported you here. --Mhhossein ^talk 20:46, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, besides the points I noted above, please note that you have committed personal attack by calling me "persistent editwarrior with agenda" and accusing me and Pahlevun of canvassing and having "a recent history of tag-teaming as pro-Iran regime." Also, you already made another accusation. Please, avoid repeating such comments; Act per WP:PA and "Comment on content, not on the contributor." The guideline adds that "Repeated or egregious personal attacks may lead to sanctions including blocks." Regards. --Mhhossein ^talk 20:03, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please familiarize yourself with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mangoeater1000.LM2000 (talk) 21:15, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm AngusWOOF. Psychonot, thanks for creating Mercy College School of Business!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Needs notability and significant coverage independent of Mercy College. Article as is has numerous references pointing to the website, press releases, non-notable "Patch" articles, and then directory listings

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:44, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm AngusWOOF. Psychonot, thanks for creating Mercy College School of Business!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Needs more information on its history, program reception (ranking among business schools), related organizations and businesses

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:48, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Psychonot,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged John Thompson (businessman) for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

^{Atsme📞📧} 00:23, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dennis Di Lorenzo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dennis Di Lorenzo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. bonadea contributions talk 14:48, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]