Contents

User talk:Radixsaurus

Hello, I'm Sfs90. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. --Sfs90 (talk) 22:12, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --Sfs90 (talk) 22:15, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As the message above says, you have to seek consensus before making such arbitrary changes like the ones you're insisting to do about the political party color templates :) If you don't seek consensus, your edits will be reverted again and again, with the risk of you being blocked because of disruptive editing and vandalism. Regards. --Sfs90 (talk) 22:21, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, if you insist in not seeking consensus, and imposing your arbitrary changes withouth consensus at all, your edits will continue to be reverted. I suggest you to seek consensus if you want that changes could be applied. Regards. --Sfs90 (talk) 22:37, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. --Sfs90 (talk) 22:40, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing the template namespace for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:56, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• You have made bold edits across multiple templates that are disputed. The onus is on you to get consensus for the changes you are looking to make. According to this post your intent was to continue forcing your changes through despite the objections.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:02, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]