A biography needs some text, one link is not enough. Xx236 (talk) 07:30, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Prof. Dr. Mohammad Zashim Uddin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nominationbyvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 16:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
The page User:Randomuserinwiki/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://du.ac.bd/faculty/faculty_details/BOT/1571#. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. — CactusWriter (talk) 17:31, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
The page Draft:Botanist Professor Dr. Mohammad Zashim Uddin has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://du.ac.bd/faculty/faculty_details/BOT/1571#. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. — CactusWriter (talk) 19:46, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — CactusWriter (talk) 19:49, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Randomuserinwiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i did not copy and paste any text from other source. I wrote in my own words on the career section by seeing the text that is thought as copy pasting. I didn't even copy paste that text. It was by itself. I was writing it in my own words whilst seeing what's written on that text in order to write on the career section. Pls unblock it. Im tired of this thing again and again. I swear I did not copy paste from other sources. I was seeing the text from other source and writing it in my own words instead of writing exactly what's writing in that source nor copy pasting. Just pls pls unblock Randomuserinwiki (talk) 06:41, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
You may not have directly copied and pasted the content from the page at issue, but what you did qualifies as too close paraphrasing to be different in terms of copyright. You shouldn't just be summarizing a single sources even if you didn't closely paraphrase it- you should be summarizing multiple independent reliable sources. 331dot (talk) 07:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Randomuserinwiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Well i apologize for doing that if that is close to copy pasting from other sources. It maybe too close to that article because i didn't have enough ideas to entirely write in my own words. So that's why it's almost close plus i do apologize for putting a photo that is present in another website that is too personal. Now i will do it next time. Now please unblock my account. I'm tired of this thing again and again. If you want to check out my appeal then here's the link: https://utrs-beta.wmflabs.org/public/appeal/view. Please do not decline this. I want the adminstrators to unblock me. I'd apologize if this is overriding the requests. Randomuserinwiki (talk) 08:01, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
"Now i will do it next time." Easy decline here. Yamla (talk) 11:40, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You are not permitted to edit (or remove) a declined unblock request for your currently active block. You are free to make a new request, but don't modify prior ones. --Yamla (talk) 16:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Randomuserinwiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i want to get unblocked because I didn't copy paste anything from other sources of text. I wrote by seeing what's in the other source in my own words below the career title. I'd apologize for using an image which is from other source. I promise i will never do that next time, this time i did it without realizing that any image from other website results in copyright violation and getting blocked by the administrators. I thought it will not have any affect since the link isn't seen but didn't know it's actually gonna have a bad effect which resulting in copyright violation. Though i did not copy paste any text from other sources to here. It may seem like i did copy but i did not. I wrote it in my own words whilst seeing that text. I did not copy paste nor wrote exactly what's written there. Just in my own words. So that's why i want to be unblocked on Wikipedia from creating drafts, articles and editing articles. Thank youRandomuserinwiki (talk) 11:26, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:07, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
