Contents

User talk:ResultingConstant

Hi, which of the bullet points from WP:ELNO do you think applies to this edit? --Distelfinck (talk) 08:10, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Distelfinck: The first one. Anything he has to say in that interview could be put into text in the article and just cite the interview. ResultingConstant (talk) 13:58, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A 16 minute interview should be quoted in full in the article? Also, there's information like body language, facial expressions, that are better confered when viewed directly --Distelfinck (talk) 14:29, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I’ve decided to underscore complex nature of laws by adding a brief section on ambiguity of category to the article, with Utah as example.

Jessegalebaker (talk) 22:34, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thank you for co-editing an article with me. You mentioned that you wanted to make one short description more accurate. However, the aim is to be concise, most of all. Tune in: https://wikipedia.com/wiki/Wikipedia:Short_description The sentence ❝Accusations of sexual misconduct against Bill Clinton, 42nd President of the United States❞ into which you reverted the short description to is 90 characters long, more than double the recommended maximum count. Moreover, it repeats words already in the title, e.g. Bill Clinton, when it is advisable to use words that are informative rather than repetitive in it. https://wikipedia.com/wiki/Bill_Clinton_sexual_assault_and_misconduct_allegations ToniTurunen (talk) 07:27, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ToniTurunen: I'm ok with something shorter, but to exclude the fact that the allegations were sexual in nature is whitewashing. ResultingConstant (talk) 18:32, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's not - sexuality is already mentioned in the title. 🙂 ToniTurunen (talk) 08:28, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]