SEMI-RETIRED
This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.
Wikipedia needs to have correct spelling throughout. While there are undoubtedly national differences, I have been unabvle to find the spelling "priviledge" in any dictionary. "Privilege", on the other hand, is to found, among others, in Chambers, my primary source, and at the dictionary.com site. Accordngly, I am working through Wikipedia making this change to spelling.
Hello Ian, welcome to Wikipedia. You might like to start by reading the tutorial and introducing yourself at the new users page. If you have any questions, you can ask at the help desk or on my talk page. Two useful tips are that you can sign your name using four tildes (~~~~) and you can preview your changes before you save using the show preview button. You can regularly find new tips on the Community Portal. I look forward to reading your great articles and I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. :) Angela. 16:09, Aug 28, 2004 (UTC)
As the only other Wikipedian with a Bislama template on their user page, I thought I'd let you know that the Babel template for Bislama (bi) got changed without any warning to bis. At first I thought my page was vandalized, but it was a change upstream in the user-bi template. --jonsafari 19:40, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there,
I noticed your note on User:Mistress Selina Kyle's talk page. As per your suggestion (which I find very reasonable), I've listed Template:User bi for moving and allowing the template for Bislama to occupy User bi. Please see Template talk:User bi for discussion. Spread the word around for those who have a userbox for Bislama as well. I would like to see the userboxes follow ISO 639-1 language codes when available, as I'm sure you would as well. Thanks! —BorgHunter (talk) 01:03, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I noticed you voted to on the abovementioned article. Initialy I wanted to keep it, but when I compared it to Nigritude ultramarine and Seraphim proudleduck it seems obvious that all theese articles are repating the same info:
I'd like to urge you to change your vote to RedirecttoSEO Contest where I have created already made a copy of the article. This way they dont have "their own article" but they are mentioned in the encyclopedia. Seems like a compromise to me. Right now w/ all the Delete, Keep, And Redirect votes it will be hard to reach a compromise.This user has left wikipedia 22:14, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
FYI: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_man_on_the_Clapham_omnibus#Merge - All I would like are some concrete examples, and I'll be quiet. ElectricRay 13:14, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Ringbark! I just logged in and noticed that my article is tagged as AfD. I read the comments and I think it is tagged for personal reasons of the AfD initiator. Would you pls leave your comment? As the author, I do not see myself the right person to give comments. I really appreciate your opinion, regardless of what you decide. Thanx! -DrMoslehi 00:25, 17 September 2006 (UTC+3:30)
Glad to help. Good category. Thanks for creating it! Pastorwayne 14:14, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
|
Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):
Request handled by: Netsnipe ► 01:33, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply] |
Hello Ian, Re: Efate -- We agree on that point. I don't think this has to be put to votes - if only because the presence or absence of accents on Efate (and Emae) is a fact rather than an opinion… Well, at least this is my opinion ;-) As for the technicalities of Redirection, I don't know; maybe we should give it a try; or simply rename『Éfaté』into "Efate" and see what happens. I'll leave this to you, right now it's bedtime on this side of the (wiki)world. (By the way, my first son was also born June 30th) Womtelo 23:05, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Ciaran Gultnieks, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please write {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Lijnema 14:17, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I seem to recall adding it and that subsequently it was removed from some countries pages. Then again I might not have gotten round to ever actually doing it I'm not sure. If you want to go right ahead. - Chrism 19:53, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for that, I wasn't aware of that policy. Thanks for correcting my mistakes! LukeSurl 23:30, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nicely spotted. I actually initially went to simply correct i --> I and did that as an after thought - should have looked more closely. Thanks! Glen 00:58, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to wikiproject anglicanism. I hope that you enjoy editing anglican related articles. Have a nice week and god bless. --Sir James Paul, La gloria è a dio 23:15, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sir James Paul, La gloria è a dio has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
Articles about living people need to cite their sources, see WP:CITE and WP:BLP. --Peta 00:07, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The guy who first proposed the project seems to be gone. I took the initiative to activate the project above in his absence, as I personally guess you all have enough members to give it a go. Good luck. John Carter 18:12, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has nominated Wincest, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wincest and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:04, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Can you help render "Be Prepared", the Scout Motto, into Bislama? Thanks! Chris 06:02, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I must infer that your comments on AfD regarding Cassandra Clare are maliciously intended, since you deny that she is a New York Times best-selling author. VivianDarkbloom 19:42, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Some people are selective they would like to see only lists of their own domination, what do u think does this list warrant deletion or should we let it stay?[2]--יודל 13:47, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 |
The current Anglicanism collaboration effortisSt. Luke's Church (Smithfield, Virginia) Voting for the next collaboration is going on now. (Vote here) |
Wassupwestcoast 01:54, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've asked for a citation for the Wizard of NZ on UC in the UK. All the other noted contestants list the year and college. 19:29, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello Ian. I have minimal knowledge of Bislama, but claim on my talk page to an elementary ability with the language. This is really over-optimistic. Thirty or forty years ago, I spent a few months in what was then the New Hebrides doing biology in some rather remote areas. During that time I learned enough to survive, but have since forgotten most of it. In an effort to be helpful, though, I recently scanned over the handful of pages in that version of Wikipedia to see if I could lend assistance anywhere. The "Unaeted Neisen" article caught my eye. Perhaps, I thought, it would be useful to add a list of the member nations. I began that task when I realized that a list of countries written in English might not be at all appropriate. Should one say "France" or "République Française"? Is it "Bosnia and Herzegovina", "Bosnie-Herzégovine", or even "Bosnia mo Herzegovina"? Any advice? Perhaps this is not really an appropriate task for me. (I suspect that's the right answer.) Tim Ross·talk 17:42, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:GuillotineCover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:42, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ringbark...I am currently in the process of writing a user box for all of the colleges that are part of Oxbridge. This template is meant to replace your current college template. Please take a look at the work in progress and comment on it. My main concerns are college abbreviations and color choice. I am using scarf colors for the colleges. Thank you. - LA @ 17:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:TheSmirks.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 01:11, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
| You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject Christianity
The goal of WikiProject Christianity is to improve the quality and quantity of information about Christianity available on Wikipedia. WP:X as a group does not prefer any particular tradition or denominination of Christianity, but prefers that all Christian traditions are fairly and accurately represented. |
|
- Tinucherian (talk) 13:28, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have nominated the Ciaran Gultnieks article for nomination, as I do not believe the subject passes the notability criteria. If you would like to contribute to the discussion regarding potential deletion of this article, you may do so here. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 22:14, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Transwikied to http://www.biographicon.com/view/vylfx/Ciaran_Gultnieks FYI. Ikip 02:40, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry to see so much of your work being deleted. I can relate. I am a member of a group of over 300 editors who save articles by adding sources.
|
Hello Ringbark! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 873 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:00, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The article Guillotine (compilation album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:47, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Guillotine (compilation album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guillotine (compilation album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:54, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:GuillotineCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 01:53, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You participated in a related discussion before. The current one is here. Japinderum (talk) 11:44, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 |
ICHTHUS |
| January 2012 |
In this issue...
Thanks for creating Hurricane glass, Ringbark!
Wikipedia editor Zanimum just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Cool, I'm amazed we didn't have anything on hurricane glasses before this, good spotting!
To reply, leave a comment on Zanimum's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Hullo, fellow WikiProject-er. We're having a discussion about the colours of Anglicanism navboxes. Please do come along and weigh in. DBD 18:44, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ros Donne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ros Donne until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 16:05, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Ringbark. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.
Hello, Ringbark. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Ringbark. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I may well need their services as it seems I have been suspended without warning. This is a test edit of my own talk page.
Hello, Ringbark. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I've seen in your user page that you speak Bislama . I would like to ask you whether you could possible help out developing the Wikipedia in that language. --Caro de Segeda (talk) 09:05, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
