Welcome to my talk page don't forget to sign your post using ~~~~ or the button. If you are looking for an old post of mine, it was probably archived by Cluebot so if it's over a week old, I suggest trying my archives which is linked to your right. If I don’t intend to respond to a post here, I’ll most likely just clear it off before it gets archived. I like to keep my talkpage pretty clean, I get annoyed scrolling through long talk pages. Also, regardless of if you're an admin or not, please do not revert my talkpage unless you are reverting a personal attack, copyright violation, or vandalism. Finally, if you're responding to a post on your talkpage, I would prefer if you respond there and ping me. Thank you and as always, Rock Chalk Jayhawk. ----------Rockchalk717
HA! I was all ready to send a note during regulation ... and then I even got nervous. Back-to-back definitely is! I really didn't want a third team tied with six Super Bowls. But now I think that team from K.C. is going to make my head hurt in the near future. Hmmm. You're welcome and enjoy it once again. :) Bringingthewood (talk) 05:27, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! I haven't had hardly negative feedback regarding improving references until your summary, which I believe is fair from your end. Just so happened to be a lot of information added to Chiefs players that was unsourced by other editors. I know KC teams are your interest so it would show up more for you on your Watchlists probably and I apologize. I was under the assumption that anything in the main body and record lists need a reliable source. I figured I would improve almost everything I could on players that had older information and incomplete citations so I could leave them alone for good until new information comes about. I personally could not find anything on the Butker item I placed a template on, and I spent a little bit of time looking for something. I can quit adding that "cn" template on stuff I cannot find but I thought that was protocol. I will improve the KC articles in moderation so you are not flooded. Thanks for all you do. Red Director (talk) 16:46, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Red Director: I don't actually use watchlist. It just makes it harder to keep an eye on edits on some of these pages when I saw 10 prove it edits. I don't mind you fixing citations at all, it is important. It's just the amount of those edits get a little crazy sometimes. I do appreciate though. I don't you want you feel like I'm criticizing the work you do either, it is great and necessary.--Rockchalk71717:21, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Rockchalk717:That is what I gathered. It can be a great task sometimes when I see a page have around 10-20 items that need verification or to be rewritten. Each item requires me to open the news link and get the information and that can be rather timely. The process is why I like some media better than others because some sites can autofill easily. When I see that my task is going to be greater on a page than others, I usually check the last version to make sure it is an acceptable version before I add content. Also, if a page has not been edited in a while, it kinds of gives me a personal green light to start major improvements. If I see a task is going to be repetitive, I do try to group those together to have 2-5 references taken care of in the same edit. Some of those take me while to get the information and that is why I do it that way. I knew from the Super Bowl edits that users made that I could use the same reference on that I would be splitting that task up into two editing periods. The last edit I usually do in the process is to get the date formats to match throughout. That edit is probably the cheesiest of them all unless there are many that need it. If it is going to be a small change, I try to group it in another edit. Congrats on your Super Bowl! You have a special situation there in KC and I can't wait to see where it goes. Red Director (talk) 17:30, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Red Director: Thanks for the explanation on what you do. Thank you It definitely is and I'm excited to see what else the future holds. It just blows my mind after going 22 years in between playoff wins they've won 3 Super Bowls in 5 years. Mahomes definitely is on a path that could dethrone Brady.--Rockchalk71717:48, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Matt Araiza, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
There's no context to the year he was released from the Chiefs other than the Super Bowl. For the sake of making it chronologically clear, should the year 2024 *not* be mentioned anywhere? February 28 without the year 2024 mentioned isn't clear. ParXivalRPT (talk) 23:27, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, why is there a hyperlink to the playoff game in question for the previous AFC Championship, but we have a generic hyperlink to the most recent AFC Championship game? ParXivalRPT (talk) 23:45, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Kansas City Chiefs has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog FarmTalk18:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I’m not sure what or how to report the user MKP2020. They continue to change all the current year college basketball team pages in the ranking section. The AP poll is including a final year after the tournament pole but he continues to change the pages back if there is not one. I’ve asked them twice on their talk page to stop changing the pages back, but they have not responded nor have they stopped making the edits which are wrong.
@Smitty Smitty: Posting at WP:ANI is probably your best bet. I've had my share of issues with that editor and they don't seem to understand when they're in the wrong.--Rockchalk71703:00, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But that's only if that editor is refusing to communicate and talk page posts haven't helped any.--Rockchalk71703:01, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
button. If you are looking for an old post of mine, it was probably archived by Cluebot so if it's over a week old, I suggest trying my archives which is linked to your right. If I don’t intend to respond to a post here, I’ll most likely just clear it off before it gets archived. I like to keep my talkpage pretty clean, I get annoyed scrolling through long talk pages. Also, regardless of if you're an admin or not, please do not revert my talkpage unless you are reverting a personal attack, copyright violation, or vandalism. Finally, if you're responding to a post on your talkpage, I would prefer if you respond there and ping me. Thank you and as always, Rock Chalk Jayhawk.
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Matt Araiza, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
