| This is Safinazuyuyor's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
|
Hello, Safinazuyuyor! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 12:03, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 01:25, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Semsûrî. I noticed that you recently removed content from Tunceli without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Semsûrî (talk) 14:39, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Tunceli, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Semsûrî (talk) 15:20, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Tunceli. Last warning. Stop with the POV-push. Semsûrî (talk) 16:03, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Semsûrî (talk) 16:18, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi new Editor. I understand that you are eager to demonstrate that Zaza are not Kurds. This is in order, but your editing behavior is a bit problematic in the long run. To start with it might be good if you edit a bit on politicians who do Zaza politics (I don't know if there exists an article on such a person), or on scholars who write that the Zaza are an other people. I often see the name Victoria Arakelova, I don't know much about her, maybe creating an article about her would be of some help. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 18:16, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Please note that the title of Bulgarian Turks was the result of extensive discussion on the article's talk page. If you want to move the article, you'll need to get consensus for that in the same way. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:01, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Safinazuyuyor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Levon Kordonciyan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
