Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Indo-Aryan migration, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.Hi Santhoshlee!,
Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia's article on Martial arts. I am afraid I have reverted your recent edit; the legends concerning Bodhidarma are covered in the History section of the article, and the article itself also concerns non-Asian martial arts which definitely did not originate in India. Your claim is also unsourced.
Take a look at the Welcome page for more details about how to include information in the encyclopedia. Best wishes, Yunshui 雲水 09:23, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Silat, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Yunshui 雲水 09:40, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Belly dance. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dawn Bard (talk) 15:11, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:27, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:30, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:34, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:18, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Star of David, without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Epeefleche (talk) 21:29, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know what makes more sense so we can continue it at Talk:Bajrangi_Bhaijaan#India.com_source. I think you have a better source but I'd rather see if anyone else agrees with you. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:04, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sir, It's not about opinions to agree or not.. Whoever changing the collections are Nothing but Salman khan fans.. They are Entering Fake Collections.. Without any proper source.. And looking at fake Collections on Wikipedia other media pages are also spreading this fake info.. I have so much trust on Wikipedia.. Don't make it lose its creditability... Put the right info and Keep the page protected.. Block those who are doing vandalism.. PLZ my humble request
They are not using poor source.. They are using Fake source.. It's Beyond Logic That they are increasing the number without any proper logic. I request you.. Until and unless you get the proper source that it crossed 400. Use this source and edit it to whatever the source says.. And plz kindly protect the page.. Don't support those people.. I might have entered wrong source but I didn't Vandalize . Many 3rd class media news papers and channels using this Wikipedia article as Main source and spreading fake news.. This Is a serious issue and a question about the credibility of Wikipedia . Here is the source.. Kindly protect the page.. And enter facts..
http://m.ibtimes.co.in/bajrangi-bhaijaan-worldwide-box-office-collection-beats-chennai-express-baahubali-salman-overseas-640840 Santhoshlee1 (talk) 11:56, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
or
) located above the edit window.This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:12, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not post the same thing over and over again. Wait for others to respond. --NeilN talk to me 18:24, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
or) located above the edit window.This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:18, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not WP:COPYVIO from external sources and add it to Wikipedia. Your edits have been reverted as vandalism. Not only that you also reverted valid edits like addition of alternate text etc. Be very careful. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 09:01, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, your edits here have been reverted because they are disruptive. Firstly, you removed an {{Estimation}} template without a justification. This template belongs in the infobox per discussion at WP:ICTF. Secondly, there is clearly a range of opinion on the current gross of Baahubali: The Beginning. Removing the range of opinion and replacing it with a single value isn't helpful, particularly when we know that box office gross values are estimates. There is an open discussion on the article's talk page. Do not change the value again without achieving consensus through discussion, as your editing privileges will be interrupted. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:29, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neither http://www.ibtimes.co.in nor thehindu.com are credible source for box office .They are not Trade websites for films.Box Office India has been giving figures for films since many years and it has been used in Wikipedia many time.also ,many other websites like The Hindu, Ibtimes, Times of india, NDTV gave different figures for Baahubali worldwide gross.Discuss on Talk page first--Conradjagan (talk) 07:25, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I repeat
Even Box Office India is not an official source.. It's not even reliable source.. Its not even a site for Tollywood news.. It's completely A Hindi Box Office Website....
Here is the link for their FAQ Section.. They clearly said... They Report Fake Collections Sometimes.. It clearly says they are not reliable
http://www.boxofficeindia.com/Details/pages/faq#.VbvWKrNVjkh
Here is the Talk Section where Admin said this
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bajrangi_Bhaijaan
When it was last discussed, boxofficeindia.com was not considered a reliable source on this website. Regardless of is extensive misuse here, I don't see any indication that we've solve the concerns that were express all those years ago. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:51, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Here is the link for the Discussion for Reliable source
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_13#Boxofficeindia.com They Clearly said
disclaimer in their website which says: "You acknowledge tha
t BOXOFFICEINDIA.COM and its affiliates do not control, represent or endorse the accuracy, completeness or reliability of any of the information available on the web site". With such a disclaimer saying that the website cannot vouch for the accuracy of the contents
YOU CANT DECIDE WHAT IS RELIABLE IT IS DECIDED BY THEM ALREADY SO ACCORDING TO RULES YOU CANT USE BOXOFFICE INDIA AS A SOURCE FOR PERSONAL SELF SATISFACTORY REASONS AND DELIBERATELY DEGRADE THE COLLECTIONS
.I HAVE TO COMPLAIN IF ANY FURTHER MANIPULATIVE EDITS ARE DONE FOR PERSONAL REASONS USING UNRELIABLE SOURCES
END OF DISCUSSION .
Santhoshlee1 (talk) 08:37, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your move of Vishwakarma (caste) has been reverted. It is contrary to discussions regarding the WP:COMMONNAME for the community, contrary to our article naming conventions, and seems to ignore the fact that we already have a perfectly acceptable disambiguation page for the alternate name. - Sitush (talk) 08:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventionsorconsensus, you may be blocked from editing. RileyBugz (p)Yell | Edits 17:29, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
