"If one is diabetic, it is essential to make control of one's blood sugar levels a priority." - Pedantic, yes, but "to make control" is indeed correct grammar. It may well be untrue in the article... your version may well be more correct, and I defer to your strongly held opinion. Thank you for your edits, and I am sorry that my reversion upset you. All the best, and happy editing.- Sinneed 03:09, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Your version may well be more correct, and I defer to your strongly held opinion. Thank you for your edits, and I am sorry that my reversion upset you. All the best, and happy editing. Honest. No condescension. - - Sinneed 03:35, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
WikiProject Zoroastrianism
|
warrior4321 12:08, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm referring to Muslim Conquest of Persia#Religion article. Here, the article seems to be focusing on only the positive aspects of the Muslim Conquest of Persia, and gives little to no details about the negative aspects, such as burning of temples, killing of priests, etc. I tried to rewrite the article as shown in this revision, using the following 3 sources:
from the Persecution of Zoroastrians article which you appear to have helped writing, however the user claims that those sources do not meet WP:RS, particularly since 2 of those are websites although I've tried to explain to him that only personal blogs/promotional websites, are not credible sources. I'd like to welcome you to join the discussion and to explain why those sources meet WP:RS, or to help find other sources which will help make the article more objective. If you would like to make other edits to make that article more neutral, those would be welcome as well.
Please feel free to respond on my talk page if you'd like to discuss this further. Thanks.
digitwoman (talk) 00:06, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not a Zoro, I'm an ex-muslim - now an atheist, but I would just like to keep the article objective & neutral. Currently the article is too biased in favor of the Muslim side of the story.
The timeline for the article has been established to be only the Rashidun invasion of Persia. We've also proposed that the article be renamed to 'Rashidun Conquest of Persia'.
The problem currently now is only finding published sources, since I don't have access to a good library currently. I've done some internet research and found a few WP:RS sources like BBC, Britannica, and Encyclopedia Iranica which mention Prosecution of Zoroastrians following Rashidun invasion. I should be able to rewrite the 'Religion' section of the article soon to balance things out and give also the Zoroastrian POV of the invasion.
I would definitely like to add a 'Motivation' section to the article, if you can think of any published sources which give some insight of this, that would definitely be helpful in creating this section.
One more thing I found on this article, which you listed in your article is the following claims:
'All non-Moslems were made to pay an extra tax called the Jizya. The penalty for not paying, was death, enslavement or imprisonment. Even when the Zoroastrians paid the tax, they were subjected to insults by the tax-collectors. ' But I've been told that I can't use that website as a source since it is Zoroastrian website and not a 3rd party site. If you can think of any WP:RS sources which confirm this claim, that would definitely help and I would be able to add that claim to the article. Cheers and good luck with your exams :). digitwoman (talk) 12:46, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi I have requested a discussion on certain edits in the 'controversy' section of the R&AW article. Your inputs would be highly appreciated at the discussion. LegalEagle (talk) 03:06, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In order for non-free files such as this one to be used in articles, they need to have separate, detailed, named rationales on the image's page. As of this message, there isn't one on that image's page for this article. The only rationale there is for a different article. Do you understand?--Rockfang (talk) 11:09, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
An article that you have been involved in editing—Asian Test Championship —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. LionsRule125 (talk) 02:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Your edit to Lawrence Technological University has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 16:47, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
