J u m p t o c o n t e n t
M a i n m e n u
M a i n m e n u
N a v i g a t i o n
● M a i n p a g e
● C o n t e n t s
● C u r r e n t e v e n t s
● R a n d o m a r t i c l e
● A b o u t W i k i p e d i a
● C o n t a c t u s
● D o n a t e
C o n t r i b u t e
● H e l p
● L e a r n t o e d i t
● C o m m u n i t y p o r t a l
● R e c e n t c h a n g e s
● U p l o a d f i l e
S e a r c h
Search
A p p e a r a n c e
● C r e a t e a c c o u n t
● L o g i n
P e r s o n a l t o o l s
● C r e a t e a c c o u n t
● L o g i n
P a g e s f o r l o g g e d o u t e d i t o r s l e a r n m o r e
● C o n t r i b u t i o n s
● T a l k
( T o p )
1
S e m i c o l o n s
2
Y o u r p r o p o s e d d e l e t i o n o f L a n d i s ( w e b c o m i c )
3
D i d y o u k n o w ? { { p r o d } } h a s a p a r a m e t e r .
T o g g l e t h e t a b l e o f c o n t e n t s
U s e r t a l k : S t a t i o n a r y
A d d l a n g u a g e s
P a g e c o n t e n t s n o t s u p p o r t e d i n o t h e r l a n g u a g e s .
● U s e r p a g e
● T a l k
E n g l i s h
● R e a d
● E d i t
● A d d t o p i c
● V i e w h i s t o r y
T o o l s
T o o l s
A c t i o n s
● R e a d
● E d i t
● A d d t o p i c
● V i e w h i s t o r y
G e n e r a l
● W h a t l i n k s h e r e
● R e l a t e d c h a n g e s
● U s e r c o n t r i b u t i o n s
● U s e r l o g s
● V i e w u s e r g r o u p s
● U p l o a d f i l e
● S p e c i a l p a g e s
● P e r m a n e n t l i n k
● P a g e i n f o r m a t i o n
● G e t s h o r t e n e d U R L
● D o w n l o a d Q R c o d e
P r i n t / e x p o r t
● D o w n l o a d a s P D F
● P r i n t a b l e v e r s i o n
A p p e a r a n c e
F r o m W i k i p e d i a , t h e f r e e e n c y c l o p e d i a
Hey there. I reverted your last edit to Monica of Hippo - as it turns out, it was grammatically correct the way it was, albeit a bit awkward. Semicolons are definitely not correct; this should be apparent towards the end of the sentence. Tan | 39 14:49, 23 April 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
You were right and I was wrong. My apologies! See my talk page to gloat. Tan | 39 15:50, 23 April 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
Hello there. You have proposed the article [[{{{1}}}]] for deletion without providing a reason why in the {{ prod }} template. You may be interested to know that you can add your reasoning like this: {{prod|Add reason for deletion here }} . This will make your reasoning show up in the article's deletion notice, and aid other editors who patrol Category:All articles proposed for deletion or WP:PRODLIST . See also: How to propose for deletion . -- At am a chat 21:35, 20 May 2008 (UTC) [ reply ]
R e t r i e v e d f r o m " https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Stationary&oldid=1141391338 "
● T h i s p a g e w a s l a s t e d i t e d o n 2 4 F e b r u a r y 2 0 2 3 , a t 2 0 : 5 7 ( U T C ) .
● T e x t i s a v a i l a b l e u n d e r t h e C r e a t i v e C o m m o n s A t t r i b u t i o n - S h a r e A l i k e L i c e n s e 4 . 0 ;
a d d i t i o n a l t e r m s m a y a p p l y . B y u s i n g t h i s s i t e , y o u a g r e e t o t h e T e r m s o f U s e a n d P r i v a c y P o l i c y . W i k i p e d i a ® i s a r e g i s t e r e d t r a d e m a r k o f t h e W i k i m e d i a F o u n d a t i o n , I n c . , a n o n - p r o f i t o r g a n i z a t i o n .
● P r i v a c y p o l i c y
● A b o u t W i k i p e d i a
● D i s c l a i m e r s
● C o n t a c t W i k i p e d i a
● C o d e o f C o n d u c t
● D e v e l o p e r s
● S t a t i s t i c s
● C o o k i e s t a t e m e n t
● M o b i l e v i e w