I see a lot of illegal edits on Wikipedia that I don't bother to undo. But I am drawing the line at spam.
Wikipedia is not an advertising service.
Thank you for your assistance. You are a good solid editor. SuperfrogJumps 22:52, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Stonegiant, this is in response to your edit comment here. That I "claim that everying written by anyone who owns an Amiga is unreliable." is incorrect. That this statement is racist is also incorrect, and to be honest a bit insulting. You are aware of the policy on civility[1].
If you wish to further contest the use of the "Foody" and "War Chicken" reviews, you should first review our policy on reliable sources WP:RS. Both reviews are self-published without editorial oversight. Neither provide any critical insight, presumably written by fans of the game: the first in particular has NPOV issues. Marasmusine (talk) 11:34, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion has begun about whether the article Total Chaos, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Total Chaos until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Marasmusine (talk) 19:53, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
