Contents

User talk:StrokeOfMidnight

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Darren Sharper page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove citations to the New York Times. This is about the most reliable source I can think of. See WP:RS. Kendall-K1 (talk) 22:38, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sergey Aleynikov. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Please stop removing source citations. This is considered disruptive behavior and can get you blocked. Kendall-K1 (talk) 23:47, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TonyBallioni was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Darren Sharper instead.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Darren Sharper's plea agreement and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2016 Milwaukee riots, you will be blocked from editing.

Hi. Apologies if I used language that was a tad harsh (i.e. vandalism); I replied on the talk page (see [1]). Yours, Quis separabit? 20:56, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, StrokeOfMidnight. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Darren Sharper's plea agreement".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 04:59, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lagrangian mechanics, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pushforward and Configuration space. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:50, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Virtual displacement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Configuration space.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:34, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inequality.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@I dream of horses: Hi StrokeOfMidnight. You recently reverted a change I made to the article Hamiltonian Mechanics. The statement made there is that the Legendre transformation is a change of coordinates ${\displaystyle ({\boldsymbol {q}},{\boldsymbol {\dot {q}}})\rightarrow ({\boldsymbol {p}},{\boldsymbol {q}})}$. This is not the ordinary mathematical definition of Legendre transformation. It may be a definition I am not aware of, but nowhere in the article Legendre transformation is this alternate definition described, which is why I think it may be confusing to use this definition in the article Hamiltonian Mechanics. In your revert, you say that "nothing wrong with defining Legendre transformation briefly while linking to the relevant article; doing so doesn't hurt anything while increasing readability," but I am not sure how this comment addresses the reasons that I edited the article. I am interested in your point of view on this. Thanks. 67.189.39.2 (talk) 02:01, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to Legendre transformation on manifolds (same article). You can safely skip the general definition. In the second paragraph, you can assume that the configuration space ${\displaystyle M=\mathbb {R} _{\boldsymbol {q}}^{n}.}$ The rest should speak for itself. Without me quoting this particular definition in Hamiltonian mechanics, the reader may have the hardest time indeed trying to connect the dots. StrokeOfMidnight (talk) 03:52, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@I dream of horses: OK, that's fine. I find the other definition greatly preferable, partially because the Legendre transform of the Lagrangian will actually be the Hamiltonian, but I'll leave it as it is. I did add something to clarify that the coordinate change is actually the Legendre transform of ${\displaystyle {\cal {L}}}$ rather than the Legendre transform itself.

There used to be a "Terminology remark" that defined the Hamiltonian exactly as you like, but, for some reason, you edited that remark out. StrokeOfMidnight (talk) 06:07, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@I dream of horses: I edited it out because it was unnecessary when combined with the other changes I made. Now that we are sticking with the less standard definition, it probably makes sense to add the Terminology remark back as well.Subrosar (talk) 19:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@I dream of horses:By the way, do you know a reference for the "manifold" definition of the Legendre transform? Subrosar (talk) 19:46, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Subrosar Why do you keep pinging me when you're talking to StrokeOfMidnight? I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 19:47, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Subrosar: Here is the article on (smooth) manifolds. Not sure if L.T. links to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by StrokeOfMidnight (talk • contribs) 21:36, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi StrokeOfMidnight,

I am kind of new to the English Wikipedia, so I don't how everything works. I wrote more than 100 mathematics articles in the German and French Wikipedia. But since you didn't respond and tagged me on this DRN page. I tell you about me, I have 10 years experience in probability and functional analysis. I read your text, I have a different opinion. I want to help people and mathematics. So I disagree with your "quality over quantity" argument regarding the "countably valued funtions". But if you want to discus why the term should not be on Wikipedia and also discus mathematics itself we can. --Tensorproduct (talk) 08:29, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, StrokeOfMidnight. Thank you for your work on Positive element. Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Ref 1,5,8 and 13 and have Harv errors as the Palmer 1977 doesn't exist. Please add it.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creepTalk 17:59, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]