Contents

User talk:Swissjane

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Logo for NBAD Private Bank (Suisse) SA.jpeg.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:52, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Logo for NBAD Private Bank (Suisse) SA.jpeg.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:47, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• I just make the changes by adding rational. Thank you for your advice.

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Vera Michalski.

To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! QuantifiedElf (talk) 23:27, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vera Michalski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vera Michalski until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. QuantifiedElf (talk) 23:33, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Logo for NBAD Private Bank (Suisse) SA.jpeg.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:53, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:NBAD PRIVATE BANK (Suisse) SA.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:13, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 09:30, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Swissjane, Please refer to Talk:European University for updated comments. Thanks. Audit Guy (talk) 02:04, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Audit Guy (talk) 12:38, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• HiSwissjane, thank you for correcting my mistakes, and sorry for the mishaps. I went through all the references and tried to do my best to make them better... hope that's okay, let me know if anything can be done better? Wish you a lovely WE. Janasommer (talk) 18:12, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Janasommer! will go and have a look. Swissjane (talk) 18:27, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've read your feedbacks and I am surprised by the will to undermine European University's status, be it by using very partial sources or by not checking properly the sources/laws/truth. Even more surprised when I start looking at pages about other private business schools in Wiki, they are unsourced advertorials and no objective editing is happening. I do not find that very wiki-like, but maybe European University did something really bad in the past? - anyway, I checked your comments and sources and agree with you. Regards Janasommer (talk) 12:21, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• HiSwissjane, long time no see! can you have a look at EU's talk page and give me your opinion? thanks!! Jana Janasommer (talk) 10:57, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]