Hello, I'm Beasting123. I noticed that you recently removed content from Wayne Elsey without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Beasting123 (talk) 21:26, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I brought back your edits. I made a mistake. Next time, please write that you are removing promotional content in the edit summary. Beasting123 (talk) 21:39, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot, Beasting123. Really appreciate it!
I have reverted the changes that you made to Talk:Alex Lechin. Per WP:REDACTED, changes that you make to older talk page posts after another editor has commented need to be indicated using strikeout text for that which is removed and underlined text indicating that which has been added. You may make changes to the talk page that way, or place the changes in a new edit request at the bottom of the talk page. Thank you for your help with this.
Regards, Spintendo 20:46, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Spintendo: Thanks for the explanation, but I quite didn't quite understand the bit on strikeout text and underlined text. It's confusing so I have added a new edit request on the bottom of Talk:Alex Lechin. Thanks. TP495 (talk) 20:24, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Altho not strictly required by the TOU, it is highly advisable to include a list on your user page of all articles where you have been involved as a paid editor. DGG ( talk ) 17:15, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@DGG: Thanks for the advice. I have added a list on my user page of all articles where I have been involved as a paid editor. You can see it hear User:TP495
TP495 (talk) 20:33, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Safaque, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Cabayi (talk) 20:55, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppetofSafaque (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Cabayi (talk) 13:22, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply] |
