 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thanks for uploading File:Gran Turismo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:23, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
The May 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:56, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Yes. To pass FAC, all of the full dates in the reference section should have the same formatting. I recommended yyyy-mm-dd to you in the PR only because you seemed to have formatted the majority of them this way, but you could make them all m-d-y. Even though it would be more work, I'd use m-d-y throughout if I were the main contributor. Then all of dates from top to bottom would have the same formatting. I think the current consistency guidelines are confusing because they recommend consistent formatting for the main text and consistent formatting for the citations but allow the consistency for the main text to differ from the consistency for the citations. The oddness is, I believe, a remnant of a former brouhaha about date linking and autoformatting. (A further complication to consider is whether to use m-d-y or d-m-y; this depends on what country the article is mainly about. Since this article is U.S.-centric, m-d-y is the right choice for the main text and would be fine for the citations as well.) Finetooth (talk) 21:39, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
The reliable source is here. And on Wookieepedia they tell that the PC version will be developed by Aspyr. 84.86.199.99 (talk) 14:20, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalismorBLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:14, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello,
I've just finished copy editing the article. Please take a look at it and tell me what you think! :)
