Contents

User talk:Taisho79

Hi Taisho79! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!

Hello, I'm SunDawn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edittoHirohito—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. SunDawntalk 08:00, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edittoNazi chic. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SunDawntalk 08:02, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's a music video that's title is a play on Hitler, a good example of Nazi chic. Taisho79 (talk) 08:10, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hirohito, you may be blocked from editing. This is the third time you are being warned for the same edits. >>> Extorc.talk(); 08:11, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edittoNazi chic. SunDawntalk 08:14, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You fool. You seem a bit slow. It is not vandalism. Taisho79 (talk) 08:17, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at TNT equivalent. Making up numbers is not acceptable. Tarl N. (discuss) 17:30, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's not vandalism. Fascist exaggerate numbers. Taisho79 (talk) 17:34, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at TNT equivalent shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Tarl N. (discuss) 17:46, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tard N. needs to get their head checked lul. It's not vandalism unless you're a cretin. Taisho79 (talk) 17:47, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.