Contents

User talk:Tarnoob

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

I know what it means I just wasn’t seeing the clarity being implemented. It was fine as it was is what I’m getting at. Rusted AutoParts 20:04, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I saw you recently created Category:Polish physicists by field, but why is this needed? Why not just have the individual fields under Category:Polish physicists as is done for the other countries? -Kj cheetham (talk) 12:38, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question similar to the above from Kj cheetham. I see you just created a new Category:Quantum electrodynamicists and have started making edits such as this whereby Freeman Dyson is no longer a "quantum physicist" but has become a "quantum electrodynamicist." The expression "quantum electrodynamicist" is not a usual way to talk about physicists who interest themselves in quantum electrodynamics. I believe this category is a mistake, and I ask you to stop changing the articles of multiple physicists until the community has had a chance to discuss the usefulness of this category. HouseOfChange (talk) 20:22, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And now also Category:Loop quantum gravity researchers has just been created under Category:Quantum gravity physicists, when List of loop quantum gravity researchers seems to do the job too. Please do slow down creating categories without consensus. -Kj cheetham (talk) 22:02, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to defend the LQG people category; I'm not sure if the guidelines specify it, but I believe that lists & categories are complementary. The way they present information can diverge; e.g. a list doesn't have to be sorted alphabetically and a category, by default, always is. --Tarnoob (talk) 22:05, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Having both a list and a category is okay in principle, as per WP:CLN, but my concern is more a case of being cautious when creating too many potentially unneeded niche categories as per WP:OVERCAT. -Kj cheetham (talk) 22:14, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it's far from overcat. 'LQG researchers' is relatively large (like, >10) & has a potential to grow in tens, if not a hundred; it's also sharply defined, doesn't overlap with anything else & is defining for some members, because it can be their main field of research & the main reason they're famous. Also, its supercategory ('Quantum gravity physicists') has a number of other members which don't fall into any sister category (like, say, 'String theorists'). Maybe it counts as lack of overlap, but I'm not sure, so I've mentioned it separately. --Tarnoob (talk) 22:25, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Quantum electrodynamicists has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. HouseOfChange (talk) 20:25, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by RoboCric were:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of string theorists and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hello, Tarnoob! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! RoboCric (talk) 07:37, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tarnoob. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of string theorists, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]