An article you recently created, Hessian Centre for Artificial Intelligence, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources (the present sources are all connected with the organization), and needs to meet the requirements of WP:CORP. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 23:30, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Tempsb. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hessian Centre for Artificial Intelligence, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
Hello, Tempsb!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:39, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Hi, I saw that you stated that terminal 3 is planned in Berlin. However, I don't see that claim being made in the given source. Are you referring to the 'master plan 2040+'? I don't think that is a substantial plan, it's more like a dream. The airport is far from reaching its limits on capacity. The newspaper seems to suggest it will only be built if traffic rises fast. That makes it looks like it's not really planned yet, it's all hypothetical. The 'light' version means it won't be what Terminal 3 previously referred to. --Ysangkok (talk) 07:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I agree with you that the sentence was not precise.
Yes, I was referring to the 'master plan 2040+'. In the download PDF version of this it is written that the red terminal buildings are "Terminalentwicklung bis 2030" which means "Terminal development until 2030". And "T3" is red.
But to avoid misunderstandings I have added a second source:
The plan to build Terminal 3 was delayed because of Covid.
To the newspaper that you linked:
If I understand it correctly, it says that probably until 2030 there is no need for Terminal 3.
But if the traffic rises really fast it could be that Terminal 3 is needed until 2030.
And that in general they still plan to build Terminal 3, but they want to wait for higher traffic numbers.
As far as I know "Terminal 3 light" is Terminal 3 at the same location in a low-cost version for low cost airlines, maybe a little bit smaller than original planned. Tempsb (talk) 14:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for this answer, I think you're correct. Regarding what 'light' means, you can see in MAZ: "Kapazität von 6 bis 8 Millionen Passagieren im Jahr haben soll". But in 2018 the Berliner Zeitung wrote: "Erst nach der Fertigstellung dieses Neubaus [T3, that is], dessen Jahreskapazität von zwölf Millionen auf 18 Millionen steigen soll, wird SXF-Alt vom Netz gehen.". So it looks like light has the same capacity as non-light, since they both mention 6 million passengers per year. --Ysangkok (talk) 05:28, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
3. Because of Covid, they had the idea to make it smaller, "Terminal 3 light" with capacity for 6 or 8 million passengers per year (Maybe it will also be possible to expand it after it is completed)