On two occasions, you have removed a source from The New York Times that provides rather clear details on the Jewish and Asian demographic makeup and replaced it with a reference from an auto rental place. In the absence of any other source, the auto rental website might be appropriate, but can you explain why you have deleted the source from The Times? Alansohn (talk) 01:49, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The Times article was about 'Hollis Hills' and only mentioned Fresh Meadows in passing. I found the new reference source in response to a complaint on the talk page of Fresh meadows.
Hi, I hope you enjoy your time here and please also consider joining WikiProject China. Thanks!--Techfast50 (talk) 00:19, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
TheFinalSay, I invite you to continue the work you did on the NEC article on the Jordan Hall article. Jordan Hall suffers the same "illness" (unsourced and unencyclopedic claims to prestige, greatness etc) as the New England conservatory article you corrected. I hope you can do some work on it since you seem to have worked a lot on these articles. Cheers! --Karljoos (talk) 00:07, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Aproposed deletion template has been added to the article Play hard-to-get, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. De728631 (talk) 12:48, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I created an elaborated article on the Continuing Ed department of NEC as a subpage in my userpage. Since I've seen you have made a considerable contribution to the NEC article, I would be grateful for you feedback on the SCE page before I post it. Any suggestions would be great. Thanks,
Radialblur (talk) 18:39, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello TheFinalSay! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 819 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:10, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
